Crettaz von Roten Fabienne
Observatoire Science, Politique et Société, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lab Anim. 2018 Feb;52(1):69-78. doi: 10.1177/0023677217708807. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Switzerland has implemented a mandatory training in laboratory animal science since 1999; however a comprehensive assessment of its effects has never been undertaken so far. The results from the analysis of participants in the Swiss Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) Category B compulsory courses in laboratory animal science run in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016 showed that the participants fully appreciated all elements of the course. The use of live animals during the course was supported and explained by six arguments characterized with cognitive, emotional and forward-looking factors. A large majority considered that the 3R (replacement, reduction and refinement) principles were adequately applied during the course. Responses to an open question offered some ideas for improvements. This overall positive picture, however, revealed divergent answers from different subpopulations in our sample (for example, scientists with more hindsight, scientists trained in biology, or participants from Asian countries).
自1999年以来,瑞士实施了实验室动物科学的强制性培训;然而,迄今为止从未对其效果进行过全面评估。对2010年、2012年、2014年和2016年举办的欧洲实验动物科学协会瑞士联合会(FELASA)B类实验动物科学必修课程参与者的分析结果表明,参与者充分认可该课程的所有内容。课程中使用活体动物得到了六个具有认知、情感和前瞻性因素的论据的支持和解释。绝大多数人认为该课程充分应用了3R(替代、减少和优化)原则。对一个开放性问题的回答提供了一些改进的想法。然而,这一总体积极的情况显示,我们样本中不同亚群体的回答存在分歧(例如,后见之明较强的科学家、接受过生物学培训的科学家或来自亚洲国家的参与者)。