ALHarbi Mohammed F, Armijo-Olivo Susan, Kim Esther S
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Speech-language pathology and Audiology, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Aug 14;332:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.050. Epub 2017 May 29.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation tool that can be used to influence cortical brain activity to induce measurable behavioral changes. Although there is growing evidence that tDCS combined with behavioural language therapy could boost language recovery in patients with post-stroke aphasia, there is great variability in patient characteristics, treatment protocols, and outcome measures in these studies that poses challenges for analyzing the evidence. The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the methodological rigor of the evidence regarding the use of tDCS for post-stroke anomia.
This critical review was conducted by searching four databases (MEDLINE, EMBase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL). Nineteen studies fully met the inclusion criteria. Three critical appraisal tools and Robey and Schultz's (1998) five- phase model for conducting clinical outcome research were adopted to evaluate and analyze the current level of evidence. Methodological issues of the studies were also identified.
The current level of evidence for using tDCS for anomia is at the pre-efficacy level with emerging evidence at the efficacy level. Lack of proper evaluation of carry-over effects in cross-over studies, lack of or unclear randomization, allocation concealment, and incomplete data handling were the main methodological issues that could threaten the validity of the tDCS for anomia studies.
Several methodological issues have been identified in pre-efficacy studies that pose challenges in determining whether tDCS is a beneficial adjunct to behavioral aphasia therapy. Future studies need to improve the quality of the methods used to investigate the effect of tDCS for anomia.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性神经调节工具,可用于影响大脑皮层活动以诱导可测量的行为变化。尽管越来越多的证据表明,tDCS联合行为语言疗法可促进中风后失语症患者的语言恢复,但这些研究中患者特征、治疗方案和结局指标存在很大差异,这给分析证据带来了挑战。本研究的目的是严格分析关于tDCS用于中风后命名障碍的证据的方法学严谨性。
通过检索四个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBase、PsycINFO和CINAHL)进行了这项批判性综述。19项研究完全符合纳入标准。采用三种批判性评价工具以及Robey和Schultz(1998年)的临床结局研究五阶段模型来评估和分析当前的证据水平。还确定了这些研究的方法学问题。
目前使用tDCS治疗命名障碍的证据水平处于疗效前阶段,有新证据处于疗效阶段。交叉研究中对遗留效应缺乏适当评估、缺乏或随机化不明确、分配隐藏以及数据处理不完整是可能威胁tDCS治疗命名障碍研究有效性的主要方法学问题。
在疗效前研究中发现了几个方法学问题,这对确定tDCS是否是行为性失语症治疗的有益辅助手段构成了挑战。未来的研究需要提高用于研究tDCS治疗命名障碍效果的方法质量。