Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gdansk Medical University, 7 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland.
Department of Informatics and Environment Quality Research, Faculty of Building Services, Hydro- and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 20 Nowowiejska Street, 00-653, Warsaw, Poland.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1021:43-53. doi: 10.1007/5584_2017_31.
Indoor air quality is strongly affected by the contamination of ambient air and that related to building and finishing materials and to human activity. Poor ventilation of closed spaces facilitates retention of greater quantity of pollutants. Infants and children are at particular risk of exposure to indoor air pollutants as they undergo rapid physiological and biochemical changes and demonstrate activity patterns unlike those in adults. Health risk assessment in children should be carried out with regard to children-specific factors, since these factors may constitute a source of errors. In this article we weigh up two different: Scenario 1 in which risk assessment was carried out in five age-groups (0-1, 2-3, 4-6, 7-11, and 12-16 years of age) and Scenario 2 encompassing only two age-groups (0-6 and 7-16 years of age). The findings indicate that data on carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects obtained by applying the second scenario were overestimated or averaged; either giving much reduced information that may lead to a false judgment on actual risk. This kind of fallacy is avoided when applying the age stratification into a greater number of groups for the health risk assessment in children.
室内空气质量受室外空气污染物以及建筑和装修材料及人类活动的影响较大。在封闭空间通风不良的情况下,污染物的滞留量会增加。婴儿和儿童特别容易受到室内空气污染物的影响,因为他们经历着快速的生理和生化变化,活动模式与成年人不同。对儿童进行健康风险评估时,应考虑到儿童特有的因素,因为这些因素可能是造成错误的根源。在本文中,我们比较了两种不同的情况:方案 1 对 0-1、2-3、4-6、7-11 和 12-16 岁五个年龄组进行风险评估,方案 2 仅涵盖 0-6 和 7-16 岁两个年龄组。结果表明,应用第二种方案得出的致癌和非致癌效应数据被高估或平均化,从而提供的信息大大减少,可能导致对实际风险的错误判断。在对儿童进行健康风险评估时,将年龄分层应用于更多的组别,可以避免这种谬误。