Ahn H J, Lee S J, Park J K, Jun B G, Seo H I, Han K H, Kim Y D, Jeong W J, Cheon G J
Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Aug 1;30(8):1-6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox035.
Catheter probe endoscopic ultrasonography (C-EUS) by ultrasonographic jelly-filled method has been used to evaluate esophageal subepithelial tumors (SETs). Ultrasonographic jelly is safe on the skin, but its internal safety has not been demonstrated. The jelly stored at room temperature is easily injected into the esophagus through the instrument channel of the endoscope. However, using jelly stored at room temperature remains problematic because the jelly is drained rapidly. We used cold lubricating jelly and an intravenous extension tube to resolve these problems. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of cold lubricating jelly-filled method. The medical records of patients who underwent C-EUS by using water or cold lubricating jelly-filled method for esophageal SETs from March 2013 to September 2016 in Gangneung Asan hospital were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and EUS findings were evaluated retrospectively. Image quality and procedure time between water and cold lubricating jelly-filled method were compared retrospectively. This study included 138 patients (74 males, 64 females) with esophageal SET with a mean age of 57.1 ± 11.1 years. Thirty-four patients had lesions in the upper esophagus, 58 patients had lesions in the middle esophagus, and 46 patients had lesions in the lower esophagus. The EUS diagnoses were leiomyoma (82.6%), hemangioma (4.3%), extrinsic compressive lesion (3.6%), granulosa cell tumor (2.9%), ectopic calcification (1.4%), cyst (1.4%), lipoma (0.7%), varix (0.7%), and inconclusive lesion (2.2%). The mean image score in the cold lubricating jelly filled-method group was higher than that in the water-filled method group (3.2 ± 0.7 vs. 2.8 ± 0.7, P = 0.002). The procedure time in the cold lubricating jelly filled-method group was shorter than that in the water-filled method group (10 minutes 27 seconds ± 4 minutes 22 seconds versus 13 minutes 20 seconds ± 6 minutes 20 seconds, P = 0.045). No procedure-related complication was observed. C-EUS using the cold lubricating jelly-filled method seems to provide better image quality and shorter procedure time compared with C-EUS using the water-filled method.
采用超声凝胶填充法的导管探头内镜超声检查(C-EUS)已用于评估食管黏膜下肿瘤(SETs)。超声凝胶在皮肤上是安全的,但其内部安全性尚未得到证实。室温下储存的凝胶很容易通过内镜的器械通道注入食管。然而,使用室温下储存的凝胶仍存在问题,因为凝胶会迅速排出。我们使用冷润滑凝胶和静脉延长管来解决这些问题。在本研究中,我们评估了冷润滑凝胶填充法的安全性和有效性。回顾了2013年3月至2016年9月在江陵峨山医院因食管SETs采用水或冷润滑凝胶填充法进行C-EUS检查的患者的病历。对临床特征和EUS检查结果进行了回顾性评估。回顾性比较了水填充法和冷润滑凝胶填充法之间的图像质量和操作时间。本研究纳入了138例食管SET患者(男性74例,女性64例),平均年龄为57.1±11.1岁。34例患者病变位于食管上段,58例患者病变位于食管中段,46例患者病变位于食管下段。EUS诊断为平滑肌瘤(82.6%)、血管瘤(4.3%)、外压性病变(3.6%)、颗粒细胞瘤(2.9%)、异位钙化(1.4%)、囊肿(1.4%)、脂肪瘤(0.7%)、静脉曲张(0.7%)和诊断不明确病变(2.2%)。冷润滑凝胶填充法组的平均图像评分高于水填充法组(3.2±0.7对2.8±0.7,P = 0.002)。冷润滑凝胶填充法组的操作时间短于水填充法组(10分27秒±4分22秒对13分20秒±6分20秒,P = 0.045)。未观察到与操作相关的并发症。与水填充法的C-EUS相比,采用冷润滑凝胶填充法似乎能提供更好的图像质量和更短的操作时间。