Clinic of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Vinzenz Hospital Düsseldorf, Schloßstr. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Clinic of Orthopedic Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstraße 40, 44137, Dortmund, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1557-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4585-8. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
Autologous blood transfusion drains are commonly used to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion rate after total knee arthroplasty. There is conflicting evidence as to whether autologous transfusion drains (ABT drains) were effective when restrictive transfusion triggers were used. The aim of our study was to ascertain where, as a part of a blood management protocol, autologous blood transfusion drains reduce the allogeneic blood transfusion rate after total knee arthroplasty.
Two-hundred total knee arthroplasty patients were included in the prospective randomized controlled study. After implantation, a Redon drain without vacuum assistance (control, n = 100) or an autologous blood transfusion drain (ABT group, n = 100) was used. Demographic and operative data were collected. The blood loss, total blood loss, blood values and transfusion rate were documented.
The blood loss in the drains was significantly increased for the ABT group (409 vs. 297 ml, p < 0.001). There was a non-significant trend towards a higher total blood loss for ABT patients (1844 vs. 1685 ml, n.s.). The allogeneic blood transfusion rate was similar for both groups (8 vs. 9%, n.s.). Similarly, the number of transfused blood units was comparable between both groups (0.2U/patient vs. 0.17U/patient n.s.).
In combination with restrictive blood transfusion triggers, ABT drains had no positive effect on the allogeneic blood transfusion rate. The blood loss in ABT drains was higher. As a consequence, the use of ABT drains was discontinued.
I.
自体血回输引流管常用于降低全膝关节置换术后异体输血率。当使用限制性输血触发时,自体输血引流管(ABT 引流管)是否有效存在矛盾的证据。我们的研究目的是确定自体血回输引流管在全膝关节置换术后血液管理方案中何处可降低异体输血率。
前瞻性随机对照研究纳入 200 例全膝关节置换术患者。植入后,使用无负压辅助的 Redon 引流管(对照组,n=100)或自体血回输引流管(ABT 组,n=100)。收集人口统计学和手术数据。记录失血量、总失血量、血液值和输血率。
ABT 组引流管中的失血量明显增加(409 比 297ml,p<0.001)。ABT 患者的总失血量有增加的趋势,但无统计学意义(1844 比 1685ml,n.s.)。两组异体输血率相似(8%比 9%,n.s.)。同样,两组输注的血单位数量也相似(0.2U/患者比 0.17U/患者,n.s.)。
与限制性输血触发因素结合使用时,ABT 引流管对异体输血率没有积极影响。ABT 引流管的失血量较高。因此,停止了 ABT 引流管的使用。
I。