Suppr超能文献

初次全髋关节置换术后是否使用引流管:随机对照试验

Postoperative autologous blood transfusion drain or no drain in primary total hip arthroplasty? A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2012 Oct;36(10):2033-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1613-7. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Postoperative maintenance of high haemoglobin (Hb) levels and avoidance of homologous blood transfusions is important in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The introduction of a postoperative drainage autologous blood transfusion (ABT) system or no drainage following THA has resulted in reduction of homologous blood transfusion requirements compared with closed-suction drains. The purpose of this study was to examine which regimen is superior following THA.

METHODS

A randomised controlled blinded prospective single-centre study was conducted in which 100 THA patients were randomly allocated to ABT or no drainage. The primary endpoint was the Hb level on the first postoperative day.

RESULTS

The postoperative collected drained blood loss was 274 (±154) ml in the ABT group, of which 129 (±119) ml was retransfused (0-400). There was no statistical difference in Hb levels on the first postoperative day (ABT vs no drainage: Hb 11.0 vs 10.9 g/dl), on consecutive days (day 3: Hb 10.7 vs 10.2, p = 0.08) or in total blood loss (1,506 vs 1,633 ml), homologous transfusions, pain scores, Harris Hip Score, SF-36 scores, length of hospital stay or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a postoperative autologous blood retransfusion drain did not result in significantly higher postoperative Hb levels or in less total blood loss or fewer homologous blood transfusions compared with no drain.

摘要

目的

在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,维持术后高血红蛋白(Hb)水平和避免同种异体输血非常重要。与使用封闭式引流管相比,THA 术后引流自体输血(ABT)系统或不引流可减少同种异体输血的需求。本研究旨在探讨哪种方案在 THA 后更具优势。

方法

本研究采用随机对照、盲法、前瞻性单中心研究,将 100 例 THA 患者随机分为 ABT 组或不引流组。主要终点是术后第 1 天的 Hb 水平。

结果

ABT 组术后收集的失血量为 274(±154)ml,其中 129(±119)ml 被再输血(0-400)。术后第 1 天(ABT 组 vs 无引流组:Hb 11.0 vs 10.9 g/dl)、连续几天(第 3 天:Hb 10.7 vs 10.2,p=0.08)或总失血量(1506 vs 1633 ml)、同种异体输血、疼痛评分、Harris 髋关节评分、SF-36 评分、住院时间或不良事件方面,两组间 Hb 水平无统计学差异。

结论

与不引流相比,术后使用自体血再输血引流管并未导致术后 Hb 水平显著升高,总失血量或同种异体输血减少。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Cell Salvage at the ICU.重症监护病房中的细胞回收
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 2;11(13):3848. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133848.

本文引用的文献

3
Red blood cell storage and transfusion-related immunomodulation.红细胞储存及输血相关的免疫调节
Blood Transfus. 2010 Jun;8 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):s26-30. doi: 10.2450/2010.005S.
7
Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery.骨科手术后的闭式吸引手术伤口引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD001825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2.
9
Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.细胞回收技术用于减少围手术期异体输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD001888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验