• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要入住重症监护病房的血流动力学稳定的急性心力衰竭患者的特征:风险评分的推导、验证和优化。

Characterization of hemodynamically stable acute heart failure patients requiring a critical care unit admission: Derivation, validation, and refinement of a risk score.

作者信息

Raslan Ismail R, Brown Paul, Westerhout Cynthia M, Ezekowitz Justin A, Hernandez Adrian F, Starling Randall C, O'Connor Christopher, McAlister Finlay A, Rowe Brian H, Armstrong Paul W, van Diepen Sean

机构信息

Canadian VIGOUR Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Canadian VIGOUR Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2017 Jun;188:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.014
PMID:28577668
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients with acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to critical care units (CCUs) are low acuity and do not require CCU-specific therapies, suggesting that they could be managed in a lower-cost ward environment. This study identified the predictors of clinical events and the need for CCU-specific therapies in patients with AHF.

METHODS

Model derivation was performed using data from patients in the ASCEND-HF trial cohort (n=7,141), and the Acute Heart Failure Emergency Management community-based registry (n=666) was used to externally validate the model and to test the incremental prognostic utility of 4 variables (heart failure etiology, troponin, B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], ejection fraction) using net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement. The primary outcome was an in-hospital composite of the requirement for CCU-specific therapies or clinical events.

RESULTS

The primary composite outcome occurred in 545 (11.4%) derivation cohort participants (n=4,767) and 7 variables were predictors of the primary composite outcome: body mass index, chronic respiratory disease, respiratory rate, resting dyspnea, hemoglobin, sodium, and blood urea nitrogen (c index=0.633, Hosmer-Lemeshow P=.823). In the validation cohort (n=666), 87 (13.1%) events occurred (c index=0.629, Hosmer-Lemeshow P=.386) and adding ischemic heart failure, troponin, and B-type natriuretic peptide improved model performance (net reclassification index 0.79, 95% CI 0.046-0.512; integrated discrimination improvement 0.014, 95% CI 0.005-0.0238). The final 10-variable clinical prediction model demonstrated modest discrimination (c index=0.702) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P=.547).

CONCLUSIONS

We derived, validated, and improved upon a clinical prediction model in an international trial and a community-based cohort of AHF. The model has modest discrimination; however, these findings deserve further exploration because they may provide a more accurate means of triaging level of care for patients with AHF who need admission.

摘要

背景

入住重症监护病房(CCU)的大多数急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者病情较轻,不需要CCU特有的治疗,这表明他们可以在成本较低的病房环境中得到管理。本研究确定了AHF患者临床事件的预测因素以及对CCU特有的治疗的需求。

方法

使用急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院治疗(ASCEND-HF)试验队列(n = 7141)患者的数据进行模型推导,并使用急性心力衰竭急诊管理社区登记处(n = 666)的数据对模型进行外部验证,并使用净重新分类指数和综合判别改善来测试4个变量(心力衰竭病因、肌钙蛋白、B型利钠肽[BNP]、射血分数)的增量预后效用。主要结局是CCU特有的治疗需求或临床事件的院内综合指标。

结果

在推导队列参与者(n = 4767)中有545例(11.4%)发生了主要综合结局,7个变量是主要综合结局的预测因素:体重指数、慢性呼吸系统疾病、呼吸频率、静息呼吸困难、血红蛋白、钠和血尿素氮(c指数 = 0.633,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验P = 0.823)。在验证队列(n = 666)中,发生了87例(13.1%)事件(c指数 = 0.629,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验P = 0.386),加入缺血性心力衰竭、肌钙蛋白和B型利钠肽可改善模型性能(净重新分类指数0.79,95%CI 0.046 - 0.512;综合判别改善0.014,95%CI 0.005 - 0.0238)。最终的10变量临床预测模型显示出适度的判别能力(c指数 = 0.702)和良好的校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验P = 0.547)。

结论

我们在一项国际试验和一个基于社区的AHF队列中推导、验证并改进了一个临床预测模型。该模型具有适度的判别能力;然而,这些发现值得进一步探索,因为它们可能为需要入院的AHF患者提供一种更准确的护理级别分诊方法。

相似文献

1
Characterization of hemodynamically stable acute heart failure patients requiring a critical care unit admission: Derivation, validation, and refinement of a risk score.需要入住重症监护病房的血流动力学稳定的急性心力衰竭患者的特征:风险评分的推导、验证和优化。
Am Heart J. 2017 Jun;188:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
2
Validation of the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure risk score in Japanese patients and the potential improvement of its discrimination ability by the inclusion of B-type natriuretic peptide level.日本患者中“遵循心力衰竭治疗指南风险评分”的验证以及通过纳入B型利钠肽水平对其鉴别能力的潜在改善。
Am Heart J. 2016 Jan;171(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
3
Clinical utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for risk stratification of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Derivation and validation of the ADHF/NT-proBNP risk score.N末端B型利钠肽原在急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者风险分层中的临床应用。急性失代偿性心力衰竭/NT-proBNP风险评分的推导与验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
4
Predicting cardiovascular intensive care unit readmission after cardiac surgery: derivation and validation of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) cardiovascular intensive care unit clinical prediction model from a registry cohort of 10,799 surgical cases.预测心脏手术后心血管重症监护病房再入院情况:从10799例手术病例的登记队列中推导并验证阿尔伯塔省冠心病结局评估项目(APPROACH)心血管重症监护病房临床预测模型。
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 19;18(6):651. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0651-5.
5
Risk prediction for 30-day heart failure-specific readmission or death after discharge: Data from the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry.出院后 30 天内心力衰竭特定再入院或死亡的风险预测:来自韩国急性心力衰竭(KorAHF)注册研究的数据。
J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;73(2):108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Trajectory of Congestion Metrics by Ejection Fraction in Patients With Acute Heart Failure (from the Heart Failure Network).急性心力衰竭患者射血分数与充血指标的轨迹(来自心力衰竭网络)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.249. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Usefulness of Incorporating Hypochloremia into the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Risk Model in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.将低氯血症纳入急性心力衰竭患者“遵循指南-心力衰竭”风险模型中的效用
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;162:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
8
B-type natriuretic Peptide-guided treatment for predicting outcome in patients hospitalized in sub-intensive care unit with acute heart failure.B型利钠肽指导治疗对亚重症监护病房急性心力衰竭住院患者预后的预测作用
J Card Fail. 2008 Apr;14(3):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.10.009.
9
Long-term survival after hospitalization for acute heart failure--differences in prognosis of acutely decompensated chronic and new-onset acute heart failure.急性心力衰竭住院后长期生存情况--急性失代偿性慢性心力衰竭和新发急性心力衰竭预后的差异。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 20;168(1):458-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.128. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
10
Head-to-head comparison of 2 myocardial fibrosis biomarkers for long-term heart failure risk stratification: ST2 versus galectin-3.两种心肌纤维化生物标志物用于长期心力衰竭风险分层的头对头比较:ST2 与半乳糖凝集素-3。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 21;63(2):158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.087. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Saddle pulmonary embolism is not a sign of high-risk deterioration in non-high-risk patients: A propensity score-matched study.马鞍形肺栓塞并非非高危患者高危病情恶化的标志:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(4):261-267. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.04.002.
2
Assessment of acute heart failure prognosis: the promising role of prognostic models and biomarkers.急性心力衰竭预后评估:预后模型和生物标志物的重要作用
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Mar;27(2):655-663. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10122-9. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Association between early intensive care or coronary care unit admission and post-discharge performance of activities of daily living in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者早期入住重症监护病房或冠心病监护病房与出院后日常生活活动能力的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0251505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251505. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of Troponin Elevation, Prior Myocardial Infarction, and Chest Pain in Acute Ischemic Heart Failure.急性缺血性心力衰竭中肌钙蛋白升高、既往心肌梗死与胸痛的比较
CJC Open. 2020 Feb 24;2(3):135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.02.007. eCollection 2020 May.