Rosenkrantz Andrew B, Silva Ezequiel, Hawkins C Matthew
Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
South Texas Radiology Group, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):1412-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
In 2006, the AMA/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) introduced ongoing relativity screens to identify potentially misvalued medical services for payment adjustments. We assess the impact of these screens upon the valuation of noninvasive diagnostic radiology services.
Data regarding relativity screens and relative value unit (RVU) changes were obtained from the 2016 AMA Relativity Assessment Status Report. All global codes in the 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule with associated work RVUs were classified as noninvasive diagnostic radiology services versus remaining services. The frequency of having ever undergone a screen was compared between the two groups. Screened radiology codes were further evaluated regarding the RVU impact of subsequent revaluation.
Of noninvasive diagnostic radiology codes, 46.0% (201 of 437) were screened versus 22.2% (1,460 of 6,575) of remaining codes (P < .001). Most common screens for which radiology codes were identified as potentially misvalued were (1) high expenditures (27.5%) and (2) high utilization (25.6%). The modality and body region most likely to be identified in a screen were CT (82.1%) and breast (90.9%), respectively. Among screened radiology codes, work RVUs, practice expense RVUs, and nonfacility total RVUs decreased in 20.3%, 65.9%, and 75.3%, respectively. All screened CT, MRI, brain, and spine codes exhibited decreased total RVUs.
Policymakers' ongoing search for potentially misvalued medical services has disproportionately impacted noninvasive diagnostic radiology services, risking the introduction of unintended or artificial shifts in physician practice.
2006年,美国医学协会/专科协会相对价值比例更新委员会(RUC)引入了持续相对性筛查,以识别可能估值错误的医疗服务以便进行支付调整。我们评估了这些筛查对非侵入性诊断放射学服务估值的影响。
关于相对性筛查和相对价值单位(RVU)变化的数据来自2016年美国医学协会相对性评估状态报告。2016年医疗保险医师费率表中所有带有相关工作RVU的整体代码被分类为非侵入性诊断放射学服务和其余服务。比较两组中曾接受筛查的频率。对经过筛查的放射学代码进一步评估后续重新估值对RVU的影响。
在非侵入性诊断放射学代码中,46.0%(437个中的201个)接受了筛查,而其余代码为22.2%(6575个中的1460个)(P <.001)。放射学代码被确定为可能估值错误的最常见筛查是:(1)高支出(27.5%)和(2)高利用率(25.6%)。在筛查中最有可能被识别的检查方式和身体部位分别是CT(82.1%)和乳房(90.9%)。在经过筛查的放射学代码中,工作RVU、执业费用RVU和非机构总RVU分别下降了20.3%、65.9%和75.3%。所有经过筛查的CT、MRI、脑部和脊柱代码的总RVU均下降。
政策制定者对可能估值错误的医疗服务的持续搜寻对非侵入性诊断放射学服务产生了不成比例的影响,有可能导致医生执业出现意外或人为的转变。