Blocker Tomica D, Ophir Alexander G
Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, U.S.A.
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A.
Anim Behav. 2016 Dec;122:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
Pair bonds are the cornerstone of a monogamous relationship. When individuals of the same species engage in monogamy and promiscuity (i.e. alternative reproductive tactics) it can be difficult to determine which tactic confers greater fitness, as measures of fitness can be difficult to ascertain. However, in these circumstances, whether animals preferentially establish pair bonds can reveal decisions that presumably reflect the animals' assessment of how to best maximize reproductive success. In nature, the majority of prairie voles, , establishes pair bonds and engages in social monogamy while a minority of individuals remains single and presumably mates promiscuously. The existence of these two tactics raises the interesting question: do bonded male prairie voles choose to 'settle' (for just one partner) or are they preferentially 'settling down'? To determine which of these two tactics is preferred, we provided single male prairie voles simultaneous access to two sexually receptive females for 24 h and then subsequently tested males in 'partner preference tests' with each female independently contrasted with a novel female. We aimed to determine whether males would form a pair bond with one, both or none of the original females. We found that males formed pair bonds with one of the two females. We also investigated male- and female-initiated aggression and found that during the bonding process males were more aggressive with females that they did not ultimately form a bond with. In the partner preference tests, males showed more aggression towards unfamiliar females than towards familiar females. Mismatches in male- and female-initiated aggression suggest that aggressive interactions may be perpetuated more by males than by females. Taken together, our results demonstrate that under conditions that are ideal for forgoing bonding and engaging in multiple matings, males choose to establish a pair bond, suggesting that selective pressures may have facilitated bonding by males.
配偶关系是一夫一妻制关系的基石。当同一物种的个体采取一夫一妻制和滥交(即交替繁殖策略)时,很难确定哪种策略能带来更高的适应性,因为适应性的衡量标准可能难以确定。然而,在这些情况下,动物是否优先建立配偶关系可以揭示一些决策,这些决策大概反映了动物对如何最好地实现繁殖成功的评估。在自然界中,大多数草原田鼠会建立配偶关系并实行社会一夫一妻制,而少数个体保持单身并可能滥交。这两种策略的存在引发了一个有趣的问题:结成配偶的雄性草原田鼠是选择“安定下来”(只与一个伴侣在一起),还是它们优先选择“定居下来”?为了确定这两种策略中哪一种更受青睐,我们让单身雄性草原田鼠在24小时内同时接触两只处于发情期的雌性,然后在“配偶偏好测试”中对雄性进行测试,将每只雌性分别与一只陌生雌性进行对比。我们旨在确定雄性是否会与两只原始雌性中的一只、两只或一只都不结成配偶关系。我们发现雄性与两只雌性中的一只结成了配偶关系。我们还研究了雄性和雌性发起的攻击行为,发现在建立配偶关系的过程中,雄性对最终没有与之结成配偶关系的雌性更具攻击性。在配偶偏好测试中,雄性对陌生雌性表现出比对熟悉雌性更多的攻击性。雄性和雌性发起的攻击行为不匹配表明,攻击性互动可能更多地由雄性而非雌性延续下去。综合来看,我们的结果表明,在适合放弃建立配偶关系并进行多次交配的理想条件下,雄性选择建立配偶关系,这表明选择压力可能促进了雄性的配偶关系形成。