Karaaslan Fatih, Karaoğlu Sinan
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acıbadem Kayseri Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Apr 17;6(2):e455-e459. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.10.026. eCollection 2017 Apr.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most common ligament injury in the knee, and progressive instability and disability may develop in a significant number of patients. The incidence of ACL reconstruction is rapidly increasing, as is the number of failures. Although ACL reconstruction is a common procedure, less than satisfactory outcomes have been reported to occur in up to 25% of patients. The reasons for clinical failure after ACL reconstruction are numerous but can be broadly separated into 3 categories: technical, biological, and mechanical failures. It is generally thought that poor tunnel positioning (especially the femoral tunnel) is the most common technical error. Revision ACL reconstruction can be performed in 1 or 2 stages. The decision to perform a multistage approach is based on the position and size of the original tunnels. The varied success rates and associated advantages and disadvantages of each method have resulted in controversy as to the best treatment for revision ACL surgery. We describe our preferred operative technique to remove a fractured nitinol synthetic ACL graft and manage single-stage revision ACL reconstruction without bone grafting.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是膝关节最常见的韧带损伤,相当一部分患者可能会出现进行性不稳定和功能障碍。ACL重建的发生率正在迅速上升,失败的数量也在增加。虽然ACL重建是一种常见的手术,但据报道,高达25%的患者术后效果不尽人意。ACL重建术后临床失败的原因众多,但大致可分为三类:技术、生物学和机械性失败。一般认为,隧道定位不佳(尤其是股骨隧道)是最常见的技术错误。翻修ACL重建可分1或2期进行。采用多阶段手术方法的决定基于原隧道的位置和大小。每种方法的成功率不同,以及相关的优缺点,导致了关于翻修ACL手术最佳治疗方法的争议。我们描述了我们首选的手术技术,用于取出断裂的镍钛诺合成ACL移植物,并在不进行骨移植的情况下进行单阶段翻修ACL重建。