Suppr超能文献

任克氏水肿的临床分级

Clinical grading of Reinke's edema.

作者信息

Tan Melin, Bryson Paul C, Pitts Casey, Woo Peak, Benninger Michael S

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Otolaryngology, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2310-2313. doi: 10.1002/lary.26647. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reinke's edema (RE) is a pathologically benign structural change of the vocal folds with a wide spectrum of clinical severity. We aim to propose and validate a clinical grading system based on size of the lesion to facilitate effective universal communication of disease severity.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with RE exclusive of other glottic pathology between December 2010 and December 2014 were included. Sixty laryngoscopy photographs were extracted from recorded archived laryngeal videostroboscopy exams, blinded and graded by four laryngologists with experience diagnosing RE.

RESULTS

A high degree of agreement among all four raters was demonstrated by high interclass correlation coefficients with a 95% confidence interval. Similarly, high intra-rater reliability was seen across all raters. Forty-nine (33%) lesions were grade 1. Thirty-five lesions (29.17%) were grade 2; 18 (15%) lesions were grade 3; and nine (7.5%) lesions were grade 4. Contralateral vocal fold was not graded in cases of grade 4.

CONCLUSION

This clinical grading for RE is a reliable tool for conveying severity of disease. High inter- and intra-rater reliability strongly suggest that RE similarly can be graded by different raters, and that a single rater is expected to grade RE similarly at different times.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

  1. Laryngoscope, 127:2310-2313, 2017.
摘要

目的

任克氏水肿(RE)是一种声带的病理良性结构改变,临床严重程度范围广泛。我们旨在提出并验证一种基于病变大小的临床分级系统,以促进对疾病严重程度进行有效的通用交流。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

方法

纳入2010年12月至2014年12月期间诊断为RE且排除其他声门病变的患者。从存档的喉部视频频闪喉镜检查记录中提取60张喉镜照片,由4名有诊断RE经验的喉科医生在不知情的情况下进行分级。

结果

所有4名评估者之间的高度一致性通过组内相关系数及95%置信区间得以证明。同样,所有评估者的评分者内信度也很高。49个(33%)病变为1级。35个病变(29.17%)为2级;18个(15%)病变为3级;9个(7.5%)病变为4级。4级病例中对侧声带未分级。

结论

这种RE临床分级是传达疾病严重程度的可靠工具。评估者间和评估者内的高信度强烈表明,不同评估者对RE的分级相似,且预计单个评估者在不同时间对RE的分级也相似。

证据级别

4级。《喉镜》,2017年,第127卷:2310 - 2313页。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验