Suppr超能文献

比较 iPad LCVA 和 Sloan 测试在多发性硬化症患者中的一致性分析。

Agreement analysis comparing iPad LCVA and Sloan testing in multiple sclerosis patients.

机构信息

Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA/Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2018 Jul;24(8):1126-1130. doi: 10.1177/1352458517713667. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Visual symptoms are common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) testing using Sloan charts has demonstrated increased sensitivity for visual deficits compared to high-contrast acuity testing. Computerized testing of visual acuity may facilitate use in the clinic setting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the agreement between an iPad-based and Sloan testing of LCVA in a cohort of MS patients.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients with relapsing-remitting MS were enrolled after providing informed written consent at Partners MS Center, Brigham and Women's hospital. Monocular LCVA was measured using retroilluminated Sloan chart and iPad-based LogMAR chart. Number of correct letters and agreement between two measurements were assessed for each eye using Bland-Altman analysis and paired t-test.

RESULTS

For both eyes, there was no significant difference in number correct between the two measurements using a paired t-test, and there was high correlation between two measurements (oculus dextrus (OD) r = 0.89, p < 0.001; oculus sinister (OS) r = 0.78, p < 0.001). The limits of agreement were -7.9 to +8.5 letters for the right eye and -10.9 to +11.2 letters for the left eye.

CONCLUSION

An iPad-based LCVA test shows good agreement with Sloan testing in MS patients.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)患者常出现视觉症状。与高对比度视力测试相比,Sloan 图表的低对比度视力(LCVA)测试已证明对视觉缺陷具有更高的敏感性。计算机化的视力测试可能更便于在临床环境中使用。

目的

评估 iPad 与 Sloan 测试在多发性硬化症患者队列中测量 LCVA 的一致性。

方法

在提供了书面知情同意书后,共有 38 名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者在 Partners MS 中心,布莱根妇女医院入组。使用背光源 Sloan 图表和基于 iPad 的 LogMAR 图表测量单眼 LCVA。使用 Bland-Altman 分析和配对 t 检验评估每只眼睛的两种测量方法的正确字母数和一致性。

结果

对于两只眼睛,配对 t 检验显示两种测量方法的正确字母数没有显著差异,并且两种测量方法之间相关性很高(右眼 OD r=0.89,p<0.001;左眼 OS r=0.78,p<0.001)。右眼的一致性界限为-7.9 至+8.5 个字母,左眼的一致性界限为-10.9 至+11.2 个字母。

结论

基于 iPad 的 LCVA 测试在多发性硬化症患者中与 Sloan 测试具有良好的一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验