Institute of Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Oct 21;43(6):1291-1303. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx053.
While there is growing interest in the potential for intranasal oxytocin (IN-OT) to improve social cognition and neurocognition (ie, nonsocial cognition) in schizophrenia, the extant literature has been mixed. Here, we perform a Bayesian meta-analysis of the efficacy of IN-OT to improve areas of social and neurocognition in schizophrenia. A systematic search of original research publications identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IN-OT as a treatment for social and neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia for inclusion. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and corresponding variances were used in multilevel Bayesian models to obtain meta-analytic effect-size estimates. Across a total of 12 studies (N = 273), IN-OT did not improve social cognition (SMD = 0.07, 95% credible interval [CI] = [-0.06, 0.17]) or neurocognition (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI = [-0.12, 0.34]). There was moderate between study heterogeneity for social cognition outcomes (τs= 0.12). Moderator analyses revealed that IN-OT had a significantly larger effect on high-level social cognition (ie, mentalizing and theory of mind) compared to low-level social cognition (ie, social cue perception) (b = 0.19, 95% CI = [0.05, 0.33]). When restricting our analysis to outcomes for high-level social cognition, there was a significant effect of IN-OT (SMD = 0.20, 95 % CI = [0.05, 0.33]) but the effect was not robust to sensitivity analyses. The present analysis indicates that IN-OT may have selective effects on high-level social cognition, which provides a more focused target for future studies of IN-OT.
虽然人们对鼻内催产素 (IN-OT) 改善精神分裂症患者社会认知和神经认知(即非社会认知)的潜力越来越感兴趣,但现有文献的结果喜忧参半。在这里,我们对 IN-OT 改善精神分裂症患者社会和神经认知的疗效进行了贝叶斯荟萃分析。通过系统检索原始研究出版物,确定了 IN-OT 作为治疗精神分裂症社会和神经认知缺陷的随机对照试验 (RCT) 纳入研究。使用多层次贝叶斯模型中的标准化均数差值 (SMD) 和相应方差来获得荟萃分析效应大小估计值。共有 12 项研究(N=273)纳入分析,结果显示 IN-OT 并未改善社会认知(SMD=0.07,95%可信区间 [CI]:[-0.06, 0.17])或神经认知(SMD=0.12,95% CI:[-0.12, 0.34])。社会认知结局的研究间异质性较大(τs=0.12)。调节分析显示,与低水平社会认知(即社会线索感知)相比,IN-OT 对高水平社会认知(即心理化和心理理论)的影响更大(b=0.19,95% CI:[0.05, 0.33])。当我们将分析限制在高水平社会认知的结局时,IN-OT 有显著的效果(SMD=0.20,95% CI:[0.05, 0.33]),但该效应在敏感性分析中并不稳健。本分析表明,IN-OT 可能对高水平社会认知具有选择性影响,为 IN-OT 的进一步研究提供了更有针对性的目标。