Urbanová Petra, Ross Ann H, Jurda Mikoláš, Šplíchalová Ivana
Laboratory of Morphology and Forensic Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7614, Raleigh, NC 27695-7614, United States of America.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Jul;49:59-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 26.
While assessing skeletal injuries in human skeletal remains, forensic anthropologists are frequently presented with fractured, fragmented, or otherwise modified skeletal remains. The examination of evidence and the mechanisms of skeletal injuries often require that separate osseous elements be permanently or temporarily reassembled or reconstructed. If not dealt with properly, such reconstructions may impede accurate interpretation of the evidence. Nowadays, routine forensic examinations increasingly incorporate digital imaging technologies. As a result, a variety of PC-assisted imaging techniques, collectively referred to as the virtual approach, have been made available to treat fragmentary skeletal remains. The present study employs a 3D virtual approach to assess mechanisms of skeletal injuries, and provides an expert opinion of causative tools in three forensic cases involving human skeletal remains where integrity was compromised by multiple peri- or postmortem alterations resulting in fragmentation and/or incompleteness. Three fragmentary skulls and an incomplete set of foot bones with evidence of perimortem fractures (gunshot wounds) and sharp force trauma (saw marks) were digitized using a desktop laser scanner. The digitized skeletal elements were reassembled in the virtual workspace using functionalities incorporated in AMIRA version 5.0 software, and simultaneously in real physical space by traditional reconstructive approaches. For this study, the original skeletal fragments were substituted by replicas built by 3D printing. Inter-method differences were quantified by mesh-based comparison after the physically reassembled elements had been re-digitized. Observed differences were further reinforced by visualizing local variations using colormaps and other advanced 3D visualization techniques. In addition, intra-operator and inter-operator error was computed. The results demonstrate that the importance of incorporating the virtual approach into the assessment of skeletal injuries increases with the complexity and state of preservation of a forensic case. While in relatively simple cases the virtual approach is a welcome extension to a traditional approach, which merely facilitates the analysis, in more complex and extensively fragmentary cases such as multiple gunshot wounds or dismemberment, the virtual approach can be a crucial step in applying the principles of gunshot wounds or sharp force traumatic mechanisms. The unrestricted manipulation with digital elements enabling limitless repairs and adjustments to a "best-case scenario" also produced smaller inter-operator variation in comparison to the traditional approach.
在评估人类骨骼遗骸的骨骼损伤时,法医人类学家经常会遇到骨折、破碎或以其他方式改变的骨骼遗骸。对证据和骨骼损伤机制的检查通常需要将单独的骨元素进行永久或临时的重新组装或重建。如果处理不当,这种重建可能会妨碍对证据的准确解读。如今,常规法医检查越来越多地采用数字成像技术。因此,出现了各种计算机辅助成像技术,统称为虚拟方法,可用于处理破碎的骨骼遗骸。本研究采用三维虚拟方法评估骨骼损伤机制,并对三起涉及人类骨骼遗骸的法医案件中的致伤工具提供专家意见,这些案件的完整性因多种生前或死后改变而受到损害,导致骨骼破碎和/或不完整。使用台式激光扫描仪对三个破碎的头骨和一组不完整的足部骨骼进行数字化处理,这些骨骼有生前骨折(枪伤)和锐器伤(锯痕)的证据。使用AMIRA 5.0软件中的功能在虚拟工作空间中对数字化的骨骼元素进行重新组装,同时通过传统的重建方法在实际物理空间中进行组装。在本研究中,原始骨骼碎片被3D打印制作的复制品所替代。在对物理重新组装的元素进行重新数字化后,通过基于网格的比较来量化方法间的差异。通过使用颜色映射和其他先进的三维可视化技术来可视化局部变化,进一步强化了观察到的差异。此外,还计算了操作员内部和操作员之间的误差。结果表明,将虚拟方法纳入骨骼损伤评估的重要性随着法医案件的复杂性和保存状态而增加。在相对简单的案件中,虚拟方法是对传统方法的有益扩展,仅有助于分析,而在更复杂和广泛破碎的案件中,如多处枪伤或肢解案件,虚拟方法可能是应用枪伤或锐器伤机制原则的关键步骤。与传统方法相比,对数字元素的无限制操作能够对“最佳情况”进行无限修复和调整,这也减少了操作员之间的差异。