Seaton Cherisse L, Holm Nikolai, Bottorff Joan L, Jones-Bricker Margaret, Errey Sally, Caperchione Cristina M, Lamont Sonia, Johnson Steven T, Healy Theresa
1 School of Nursing, Institute for Healthy Living and Chronic Disease Prevention, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
2 Canadian Cancer Society, British Columbia & Yukon Division, Prince George, Canada.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 May;32(4):1095-1109. doi: 10.1177/0890117117710875. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
To explore published empirical literature in order to identify factors that facilitate or inhibit collaborative approaches for health promotion using a scoping review methodology.
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete for articles published between January 2001 and October 2015 was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
To be included studies had to: be an original research article, published in English, involve at least 2 organizations in a health promotion partnership, and identify factors contributing to or constraining the success of an established (or prior) partnership. Studies were excluded if they focused on primary care collaboration or organizations jointly lobbying for a cause.
Data extraction was completed by 2 members of the author team using a summary chart to extract information relevant to the factors that facilitated or constrained collaboration success.
NVivo 10 was used to code article content into the thematic categories identified in the data extraction.
Twenty-five studies across 8 countries were identified. Several key factors contributed to collaborative effectiveness, including a shared vision, leadership, member characteristics, organizational commitment, available resources, clear roles/responsibilities, trust/clear communication, and engagement of the target population.
In general, the findings were consistent with previous reviews; however, additional novel themes did emerge.
采用范围综述方法,探索已发表的实证文献,以确定促进或抑制健康促进合作方法的因素。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,对MEDLINE、CINAHL、ScienceDirect、PsycINFO和学术搜索完整版进行全面检索,查找2001年1月至2015年10月期间发表的文章。
纳入的研究必须:是一篇原创研究文章,以英文发表,涉及健康促进伙伴关系中的至少2个组织,并确定有助于或限制既定(或先前)伙伴关系成功的因素。如果研究侧重于初级保健合作或组织联合游说某项事业,则将其排除。
作者团队的2名成员使用汇总表完成数据提取,以提取与促进或限制合作成功的因素相关的信息。
使用NVivo 10将文章内容编码为数据提取中确定的主题类别。
确定了来自8个国家的25项研究。几个关键因素有助于合作成效,包括共同愿景、领导力、成员特征、组织承诺、可用资源、明确的角色/职责、信任/清晰沟通以及目标人群的参与。
总体而言,研究结果与之前的综述一致;然而,确实出现了其他新主题。