Conformational studies of two histamine H2-receptor antagonistic phenylformamidines: mifentidine and its guanidinothiazole analogue DA 4643.

Two histamine H2-receptor antagonists of the phenylformamidine type, mifentidine (N-isopropyl-N'-(4-1H-imidazol-4-yl-phenyl) formamidine dihydrochloride; I) and DA 4643 (N-methyl-N'-(3-(2-guanidinothiazol-4-yl)-phenyl) formamidine dihydrochloride; II), have been investigated by experimental physico-chemical studies and theoretical conformational analysis. PKa determinations on the two molecules I and II show that these substances exist at physiological pH (7.4) predominantly as their monoprotonated forms at the formamidine moiety. Semiempirical quantum mechanical (MNDO, CNDO/2) and molecular mechanics (MMPI) calculations show a preference of the nearly planar conformations for I and of different low energy rotamers for II. The energy of these conformers is a function of two important torsion angles, one around the bond joining the imidazole, or the guanidinothiazole, and the phenyl ring and the other around the bond joining the phenyl ring and the formamidinium cation. When the distances between crucial parts present in I and II are considered, it results that the relatively higher flexibility of II allows accommodation of amidine pairs present in the latter at a distance similar to that found for correspondent pairs in the conformationally more restricted I. Conformational aspects of I and II are discussed with reference to a recently described conformation of cimetidine determined by X-ray method. A hypothesis of binding of H2-receptor antagonists of the phenylformamidine type is advanced with reference to electrostatic potential maps calculated for crucial part structures of I, II and cimetidine. The present work supports the hypothesis that both mifentidine and DA 4643 interact with the histamine H2-receptor at the same site, utilizing in the binding process the same, or closely similar, receptor structural features.