Suppr超能文献

经神经周围注射地塞米松用于外周神经阻滞比静脉注射更有效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Dexamethasone Injected Perineurally is More Effective than Administered Intravenously for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Zorrilla-Vaca Andres, Li Jinlei

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):276-284. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000519.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are widely and increasingly used for better acute perioperative pain control for a variety of procedures. Clinically preservative-free dexamethasone is arguably the most commonly used adjuvant and offers the most optimization effects on PNBs yet with the least side-effects noted. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone on the effectiveness and safety of PNBs.

METHODS

Major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, ISI Web of Science, Google Scholar) were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone on PNBs. Study characteristics, intraoperative events, and postoperative outcomes including duration of analgesia, duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, pain score at 24 hours, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, were extracted from the articles. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 937 patients (intravenous: 464 patients; perineural: 473 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.48 h; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.79) and sensory block (SMD, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94). In subgroup of studies that used 4 to 5 mg we found that perineural dexamethasone was universally more effective to prolong analgesia as compared with intravenous dexamethasone (SMD, 0.48 h; 95% CI, 0.24-0.72), but there was no significant difference between intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone when using a dose of dexamethasone ≥8 mg (SMD, 0.33 h; 95% CI, -0.11 to 0.77). Perineural dexamethasone had similarly more benefits in terms of prolongation of motor block duration, decreasing pain score, reducing opioid consumption, and less postoperative nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation not only confirmed the better analgesic effects of perineurally administered dexamethasone as compared with its intravenous injection, but also implicitly supported the hypothesis of local interaction between dexamethasone and the nerve as one of the pain modulation mechanisms of dexamethasone, because systemic absorption alone could not explain the superior quality of PNBs.

摘要

引言

外周神经阻滞(PNBs)被广泛且越来越多地用于各种手术,以更好地控制围手术期急性疼痛。临床上,无防腐剂的地塞米松可以说是最常用的辅助药物,对PNBs具有最大的优化效果,且副作用最少。我们的目的是比较静脉注射与神经周围注射地塞米松对PNBs有效性和安全性的影响。

方法

系统检索主要数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、ISI科学网、谷歌学术),以查找比较静脉注射与神经周围注射地塞米松对PNBs有效性的随机对照试验。从文章中提取研究特征、术中事件和术后结果,包括镇痛持续时间、感觉阻滞持续时间、运动阻滞持续时间、24小时疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗量以及术后恶心和呕吐情况。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了13项随机对照试验,共937例患者(静脉注射组:464例患者;神经周围注射组:473例患者)。神经周围注射地塞米松显著延长了镇痛持续时间(标准化均数差[SMD],0.48小时;95%置信区间[CI],0.18 - 0.79)和感觉阻滞持续时间(SMD,0.74;95% CI,0.53 - 0.94)。在使用4至5毫克地塞米松的研究亚组中,我们发现与静脉注射地塞米松相比,神经周围注射地塞米松在延长镇痛时间方面普遍更有效(SMD,0.48小时;95% CI,0.24 - 0.72),但当使用≥8毫克地塞米松剂量时,静脉注射与神经周围注射地塞米松之间没有显著差异(SMD,0.33小时;95% CI,-0.11至0.77)。神经周围注射地塞米松在延长运动阻滞持续时间、降低疼痛评分、减少阿片类药物消耗量以及减少术后恶心和呕吐方面同样有更多益处。

结论

本研究不仅证实了神经周围注射地塞米松比静脉注射具有更好的镇痛效果,还隐含地支持了地塞米松与神经之间局部相互作用的假说,这是地塞米松疼痛调节机制之一,因为仅全身吸收无法解释PNBs的优越效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验