Zufferey Paul J, Chaux Robin, Lachaud Pierre-Adrien, Capdevila Xavier, Lanoiselée Julien, Ollier Edouard
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2024 May;132(5):1122-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.021. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
BACKGROUND: Superiority of perineural over intravenous dexamethasone at extending nerve block analgesia has been suggested but without considering the dose-response relationships for each route of administration. METHODS: Randomised control studies that evaluated intravenous or perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to unilateral peripheral nerve blocks in adults were searched up to October 2023 in MEDLINE, Central, Google Scholar, and reference lists of previous systematic reviews. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool was used. A maximum effect (E) model-based network meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the dose-response relationships of dexamethasone. RESULTS: A total of 118 studies were selected (9284 patients; 35 with intravenous dexamethasone; 106 with perineural dexamethasone; dose range 1-16 mg). Studies with unclear or high risk of bias overestimated the effect of dexamethasone. Bias-corrected estimates indicated a maximum fold increase in analgesia duration of 1.7 (95% credible interval (CrI) 1.4-1.9) with dexamethasone, with no difference between perineural and intravenous routes. Trial simulations indicated that 4 mg of perineural dexamethasone increased the mean duration of analgesia for long-acting local anaesthetics from 11.1 h (95% CrI 9.4-13.1) to 16.5 h (95% CrI 14.0-19.3) and halved the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A similar magnitude of effect was observed with 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: Used as an adjuvant for peripheral nerve block, intravenous dexamethasone can be as effective as perineural dexamethasone in prolonging analgesic duration, but is less potent, hence requiring higher doses. The evidence is limited because of the observational nature of the dose-response relationships and the quality of the included studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42020141689.
背景:有人提出在延长神经阻滞镇痛方面,神经周围注射地塞米松优于静脉注射地塞米松,但未考虑每种给药途径的剂量反应关系。 方法:截至2023年10月,在MEDLINE、CENTRAL、谷歌学术以及以往系统评价的参考文献列表中检索评估静脉或神经周围注射地塞米松作为成人单侧周围神经阻滞辅助药物的随机对照研究。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具。进行基于最大效应(E)模型的网络荟萃分析以评估地塞米松的剂量反应关系。 结果:共纳入118项研究(9284例患者;35例静脉注射地塞米松;106例神经周围注射地塞米松;剂量范围1 - 16毫克)。偏倚不明确或风险高的研究高估了地塞米松的效果。经偏倚校正的估计表明,地塞米松使镇痛持续时间的最大增加倍数为1.7(95%可信区间(CrI)1.4 - 1.9),神经周围注射和静脉注射途径之间无差异。试验模拟表明,4毫克神经周围注射地塞米松可使长效局部麻醉药的平均镇痛持续时间从11.1小时(95% CrI 9.4 - 13.1)增加到16.5小时(95% CrI 14.0 - 19.3),并使术后恶心呕吐发生率减半。8毫克静脉注射地塞米松也观察到类似程度的效果。 结论:作为周围神经阻滞的辅助药物,静脉注射地塞米松在延长镇痛持续时间方面与神经周围注射地塞米松效果相当,但效力较弱,因此需要更高剂量。由于剂量反应关系的观察性质和纳入研究的质量,证据有限。 系统评价方案:PROSPERO CRD42020141689
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-6-6
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025-6-27
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025-4