Bortolotto Chandra, Lungarotti Luca, Fiorina Ilaria, Zacchino Michela, Draghi Ferdinando, Calliada Fabrizio
Radiology Institute, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Piazzale Golgi, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
J Ultrasound. 2017 Mar 1;20(2):139-146. doi: 10.1007/s40477-017-0242-9. eCollection 2017 Jun.
The aim of this study is to quantitatively assess lower limbs muscle elasticity in a court of healthy subjects and to evaluate the influence of technical variables (e.g., diameter of the ROI-region of interest) and examined subjects' characteristics (e.g., sex, levels of physical activity, side evaluated) on muscle stiffness.
54 healthy subjects (48 men, 6 women) were evaluated for a total of 108 lower limbs. Shear wave elastography was performed with a multifrequency linear probe (15-4 MHz). Two radiologists performed the evaluation of lower limbs from left to right side (first calf and then thigh). The measures were taken on gastrocnemius and on femoral biceps muscle belly. We chose to place for this study two ROIs of 4 and 2 mm of diameter.
The mean muscle stiffness was 1.98 ± 0.48 (range between 1.89 ± 0.36 and 2.15 ± 0.57 m/s). The difference in muscle stiffness between left and right side of the body and between different levels of physical activity never became statistically significant ( value between 0.314 and 0.915). Only in one test out of eight the difference of muscle stiffness between male and female resulted statistically significant ( value 0.020). When comparing the measurement obtained with a 2 and 4 mm diameter ROIs the values were statistically different only for the left thigh ( value 0.028).
Our study, despite its limitations (low sample and low female population), seems to give some clear advice: physiological or technical factors do not determine statistically significant differences on passive muscle stiffness.
本研究旨在定量评估健康受试者群体下肢肌肉弹性,并评估技术变量(如感兴趣区域的直径)和受试对象特征(如性别、身体活动水平、评估侧别)对肌肉硬度的影响。
对54名健康受试者(48名男性,6名女性)共108条下肢进行评估。使用多频线性探头(15 - 4 MHz)进行剪切波弹性成像。两名放射科医生从左至右对下肢(先小腿后大腿)进行评估。测量在腓肠肌和股二头肌肌腹进行。本研究选择放置两个直径分别为4毫米和2毫米的感兴趣区域。
平均肌肉硬度为1.98 ± 0.48(范围在1.89 ± 0.36至2.15 ± 0.57米/秒之间)。身体左右侧之间以及不同身体活动水平之间的肌肉硬度差异从未达到统计学显著水平(P值在0.314至0.915之间)。仅在八项测试中的一项中,男性和女性之间的肌肉硬度差异具有统计学显著性(P值0.020)。比较使用直径2毫米和4毫米感兴趣区域获得的测量值时,仅左侧大腿的值在统计学上存在差异(P值0.028)。
我们的研究尽管存在局限性(样本量小且女性人数少),但似乎给出了一些明确的建议:生理或技术因素不会在统计学上导致被动肌肉硬度出现显著差异。