McClead R E, Meng H C, Gregory S A, Budde C, Sloan H R
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985 Apr;4(2):234-9. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198504000-00014.
We report the results of a randomized comparison of two intravenous safflower oil (fat) emulsions in neonates who required total parenteral nutrition. The fat emulsions differed only in their content of alpha-linolenic acid: in one emulsion the alpha-linolenic acid content of the oil was 0.1% of fatty acids, while in the other emulsion the alpha-linolenic acid content of the oil was 3.0 +/- 1.5% (SD) of fatty acids. Group 1 and 2 patients received the "low" and "high" alpha-linolenic acid emulsions, respectively. Ten patients were studied in each group. The mean daily fat dosage was 1.70 g/kg in patients of Group 1 and 1.56 g/kg in those of Group 2. No significant difference in the clinical effects of either fat emulsion could be detected between the two study groups. Both emulsions prevented or corrected biochemical signs of essential fatty acid deficiency. The major statistically significant difference between study groups was in the level of alpha-linolenic acid and its metabolite, eicosapentaenoic acid. After 2 weeks of fat therapy, these fatty acids were increased in the high alpha-linolenic acid group; however, another metabolite of linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, decreased during intravenous fat therapy in both study groups. Both study groups had significantly decreased arachidonic acid levels and increased linoleic to arachidonic acid ratios.
我们报告了在需要全胃肠外营养的新生儿中对两种静脉注射红花油(脂肪)乳剂进行随机比较的结果。这两种脂肪乳剂仅在α-亚麻酸含量上有所不同:一种乳剂中油的α-亚麻酸含量为脂肪酸的0.1%,而另一种乳剂中油的α-亚麻酸含量为脂肪酸的3.0±1.5%(标准差)。第1组和第2组患者分别接受“低”和“高”α-亚麻酸乳剂。每组研究10例患者。第1组患者的平均每日脂肪剂量为1.70 g/kg,第2组为1.56 g/kg。在两个研究组之间未检测到两种脂肪乳剂临床效果的显著差异。两种乳剂均预防或纠正了必需脂肪酸缺乏的生化指标。研究组之间主要的统计学显著差异在于α-亚麻酸及其代谢产物二十碳五烯酸的水平。脂肪治疗2周后,高α-亚麻酸组的这些脂肪酸增加;然而,在两个研究组的静脉脂肪治疗期间,亚麻酸的另一种代谢产物二十二碳六烯酸减少。两个研究组的花生四烯酸水平均显著降低,亚油酸与花生四烯酸的比值增加。