Jones Graham R D, Albarede Stephanie, Kesseler Dagmar, MacKenzie Finlay, Mammen Joy, Pedersen Morten, Stavelin Anne, Thelen Marc, Thomas Annette, Twomey Patrick J, Ventura Emma, Panteghini Mauro
, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney - SydPath, Victoria St.
.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jun 27;55(7):949-955. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0151.
External Quality Assurance (EQA) is vital to ensure acceptable analytical quality in medical laboratories. A key component of an EQA scheme is an analytical performance specification (APS) for each measurand that a laboratory can use to assess the extent of deviation of the obtained results from the target value. A consensus conference held in Milan in 2014 has proposed three models to set APS and these can be applied to setting APS for EQA. A goal arising from this conference is the harmonisation of EQA APS between different schemes to deliver consistent quality messages to laboratories irrespective of location and the choice of EQA provider. At this time there are wide differences in the APS used in different EQA schemes for the same measurands. Contributing factors to this variation are that the APS in different schemes are established using different criteria, applied to different types of data (e.g. single data points, multiple data points), used for different goals (e.g. improvement of analytical quality; licensing), and with the aim of eliciting different responses from participants. This paper provides recommendations from the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Task and Finish Group on Performance Specifications for External Quality Assurance Schemes (TFG-APSEQA) and on clear terminology for EQA APS. The recommended terminology covers six elements required to understand APS: 1) a statement on the EQA material matrix and its commutability; 2) the method used to assign the target value; 3) the data set to which APS are applied; 4) the applicable analytical property being assessed (i.e. total error, bias, imprecision, uncertainty); 5) the rationale for the selection of the APS; and 6) the type of the Milan model(s) used to set the APS. The terminology is required for EQA participants and other interested parties to understand the meaning of meeting or not meeting APS.
外部质量保证(EQA)对于确保医学实验室可接受的分析质量至关重要。EQA计划的一个关键组成部分是针对每个被测量物的分析性能规范(APS),实验室可使用该规范来评估所获结果与目标值的偏差程度。2014年在米兰召开的一次共识会议提出了三种设定APS的模型,这些模型可应用于为EQA设定APS。此次会议产生的一个目标是使不同计划之间的EQA APS实现协调统一,以便无论实验室位于何处以及选择何种EQA提供者,都能向其传达一致的质量信息。目前,针对相同被测量物,不同EQA计划所使用的APS存在很大差异。造成这种差异的因素包括:不同计划中的APS是依据不同标准制定的,应用于不同类型的数据(例如单个数据点、多个数据点),用于不同目标(例如提高分析质量;发放许可证),并且旨在引发参与者不同的反应。本文提供了欧洲检验医学联合会(EFLM)外部质量保证计划性能规范任务与完成小组(TFG - APSEQA)的建议以及关于EQA APS的清晰术语。推荐的术语涵盖了理解APS所需的六个要素:1)关于EQA物质基质及其互换性的说明;2)用于指定目标值的方法;3)应用APS的数据集;4)正在评估的适用分析特性(即总误差、偏差、不精密度、不确定度);5)选择APS的理由;6)用于设定APS的米兰模型类型。EQA参与者和其他相关方需要使用该术语来理解达到或未达到APS的含义。