• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟疼痛特征和复发率:自夹式 Progrip 网片与缝合式聚丙烯网片修补开放式腹股沟疝的随机对照试验三年结果比较。

Groin Pain Characteristics and Recurrence Rates: Three-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Self-gripping Progrip Mesh and Sutured Polypropylene Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

SolviMáx, Center of Expertise for ACNES, Center of Excellence for Chronic Abdominal Wall and Groin Pain, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2018 Jun;267(6):1028-1033. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002331.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002331
PMID:28594747
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term groin pain and inguinal hernia recurrence rates of 2 types of mesh and to describe the evolution of postoperative groin sensory disturbances.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Some patients with an inguinal hernia develop chronic pain following open mesh insertion. Previous trials comparing a semi-resorbable, self-gripping Progrip mesh with a standard sutured polypropylene mesh found conflicting results regarding recurrence rates and residual groin pain.

METHODS

Patients aged >18 years scheduled for open primary hernia repair were randomized to a self-gripping mesh (Progrip) or a polypropylene mesh (standard). Removal of the inguinal nerves was left to the discretion of the surgeon. Pain was measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) over a 3-year period. Pain characteristics and hernia recurrences were determined using physical examination.

RESULTS

Data of 274 patients were complete (75% three-year follow-up rate). Pain steadily decreased over time in both groups in a similar fashion (moderate pain 3.7% in each group). Hyperesthesia was experienced by 2.2% and 3.7% and hypoesthesia in 12% and 19% in Progrip and standard group, respectively. One of seven Progrip patients reported a foreign body feeling versus 1 of 5 standard patients (P = 0.06). Altered skin sensations were not related to a neurectomy. Hernia recurrence rate was 11.5% in the Progrip and 5% in the standard group (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Three years after insertion of a self-gripping Progrip mesh or a sutured polypropylene mesh for an open primary inguinal hernia repair, groin pain is minimal, although altered groin skin sensations and foreign body feeling are quite common. A Progrip hernia repair is associated with a high recurrence rate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查两种类型的网片在长期腹股沟疼痛和腹股沟疝复发率方面的情况,并描述术后腹股沟感觉障碍的演变。

背景资料概要

一些腹股沟疝患者在开放式网片植入后会出现慢性疼痛。先前比较自固位、自夹合 Progrip 网片与标准缝合聚丙烯网片的试验在复发率和残余腹股沟疼痛方面得出了相互矛盾的结果。

方法

将年龄>18 岁、拟行开放式原发性疝修补术的患者随机分为自固位网片(Progrip)或聚丙烯网片(标准)组。腹股沟神经的切除由术者决定。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)在 3 年内测量疼痛。通过体格检查确定疼痛特征和疝复发情况。

结果

274 例患者的数据完整(3 年随访率为 75%)。两组患者的疼痛均随时间逐渐减轻,且方式相似(两组中度疼痛分别为 3.7%)。超敏反应分别为 2.2%和 3.7%,感觉迟钝分别为 12%和 19%,Progrip 组和标准组分别有 1 例患者报告异物感,7 例 Progrip 患者中有 1 例,5 例标准患者中有 1 例(P=0.06)。感觉改变与神经切除术无关。Progrip 组疝复发率为 11.5%,标准组为 5%(P=0.05)。

结论

在开放式原发性腹股沟疝修补术后 3 年,自固位 Progrip 网片或缝合聚丙烯网片植入后腹股沟疼痛轻微,但腹股沟皮肤感觉改变和异物感较为常见。Progrip 疝修补术与高复发率相关。

相似文献

1
Groin Pain Characteristics and Recurrence Rates: Three-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Self-gripping Progrip Mesh and Sutured Polypropylene Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair.腹股沟疼痛特征和复发率:自夹式 Progrip 网片与缝合式聚丙烯网片修补开放式腹股沟疝的随机对照试验三年结果比较。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jun;267(6):1028-1033. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002331.
2
The HIPPO Trial, a Randomized Double-blind Trial Comparing Self-gripping Parietex Progrip Mesh and Sutured Parietex Mesh in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty: A Long-term Follow-up Study.HIPPO试验:一项在Lichtenstein疝修补术中比较自固定Parietex Progrip补片与缝合Parietex补片的随机双盲试验——长期随访研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):939-945. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002169.
3
Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result.开放性腹股沟疝修补术中自固定半可吸收补片(PROGRIP)与聚丙烯补片对比的随机试验:6年结果
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1545-z. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
4
The transinguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP) in inguinal hernia repair does not cause less chronic pain in relation to the ProGrip technique: a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing the TIPP technique, using the PolySoft mesh, with the ProGrip self-fixing semi-resorbable mesh.腹股沟疝修补术中的经腹股沟腹膜前技术(TIPP)与ProGrip技术相比,并不会减少慢性疼痛:一项前瞻性双盲随机临床试验,比较了使用PolySoft补片的TIPP技术与ProGrip自固定半可吸收补片。
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1522-6. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
5
Three-year results of a randomized study comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.一项比较自固定补片与缝合补片用于开放腹股沟疝修补术的随机研究的三年结果
J Surg Res. 2017 Mar;209:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Open inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping Parietex ProGrip mesh: a retrospective study of 204 cases.使用自固定Parietex ProGrip补片进行开放性腹股沟疝修补术:204例回顾性研究
G Chir. 2019 Jan-Feb;40(1):26-31.
7
Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.随机临床试验比较自固定网片与缝线固定轻质聚丙烯网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1373-82; discussion 1382. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9598. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Long-term results of the SOFTGRIP trial: TIPP versus ProGrip Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair.SOFTGRIP 试验的长期结果:TIPP 与 ProGrip 平片式腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02542-1. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.开放腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片(Progrip)与缝合补片的Meta分析。
Surgeon. 2014 Apr;12(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.024. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
10
Comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of long-term results.开放式腹股沟疝修补术中自固定网片与缝合网片的比较:长期结果的荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2018 Feb;163(2):351-360. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The DySLOH Study: Comparative Evaluation of the Results between the ProFlor and Lichtenstein Techniques for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair-A Randomized Controlled Trial.DySLOH研究:ProFlor技术与Lichtenstein技术用于开放腹股沟疝修补术的结果比较评估——一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5530. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185530.
2
N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Versus Absorbable Tacks in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中N-丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂与可吸收钉的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Jul 15;5(3):e462. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000462. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Comprehensive systematic review on the self-gripping mesh vs sutured mesh in inguinal hernia repair.
腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片与缝合补片的综合系统评价
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Dec 31;17:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.12.010. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Physiologic Cyclical Load on Inguinal Hernia Scaffold ProFlor Turns Biological Response into Tissue Regeneration.腹股沟疝支架ProFlor上的生理性周期性负荷将生物反应转化为组织再生。
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;12(3):434. doi: 10.3390/biology12030434.
5
Prediction of successful revision surgery for mesh-related complaints after inguinal hernia and pelvic organ prolapse repair.预测腹股沟疝和盆腔器官脱垂修补术后因网片相关问题行翻修手术的成功率。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02748-5. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
Long-term results of the SOFTGRIP trial: TIPP versus ProGrip Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair.SOFTGRIP 试验的长期结果:TIPP 与 ProGrip 平片式腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02542-1. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Meta-analysis of postoperative pain using non-sutured or sutured single-layer open mesh repair for inguinal hernia.Meta 分析使用非缝合或缝合单层开放式网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛。
BJS Open. 2019 Feb 27;3(3):260-273. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50139. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.腹股沟疝修补术后患者对急性疼痛和活动受限的认知:机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的倾向匹配比较
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0790-9. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
9
Risk factors for contralateral inguinal hernia repair after unilateral inguinal hernia repair in male adult patients: analysis from a nationwide population based cohort study.成年男性患者单侧腹股沟疝修补术后对侧腹股沟疝修补的危险因素:基于全国人群队列研究的分析
BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0302-2.