• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊子宫托取出与更换时使用麻醉乳膏:一项随机对照试验

Anesthetic Cream Use During Office Pessary Removal and Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Taege Susanne K, Adams William, Mueller Elizabeth R, Brubaker Linda, Fitzgerald Colleen M, Brincat Cynthia

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, and the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Urology, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and the Health Sciences Division, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):190-197. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002098.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002098
PMID:28594757
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream on patient pain at the time of office pessary removal and reinsertion.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, participants undergoing routine pessary care in a urogynecology office at a tertiary referral center were randomized to application of 4 g of either lidocaine-prilocaine or placebo cream 5 minutes before pessary change. Visual analog scale pain scores were collected from the patient at baseline, after pessary removal, and after pessary reinsertion. Physicians also recorded their estimate of patient pain at pessary removal and reinsertion. The primary outcome was the participant-reported visual analog scale pain score at the time of pessary removal and reinsertion. A sample size of 26 per group (n=52) was planned to estimate an absolute mean difference in visual analog scale pain of 2.1 cm at the time of pessary removal. An analysis of covariance was used to evaluate pain at removal and reinsertion as a function of treatment assignment controlling for baseline pain.

RESULTS

From July 2015 through February 2016, 116 women were screened and 54 were recruited: 28 in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group and 26 in the placebo group. One patient in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group was later withdrawn owing to vaginal erosion. The participants were all postmenopausal women, with an average age of 77.8 years. Most characteristics were similar between groups. After adjusting for baseline pain, participants randomized to the lidocaine-prilocaine group had lower pain at pessary removal when compared with those assigned to placebo (mean difference=-2.05, 95% confidence interval -3.69 to -0.41; P=.015).

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine-prilocaine cream use at the time of office pessary removal reduces patient-reported pain. Clinicians may wish to include this simple intervention to optimize patient comfort and compliance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02380742.

摘要

目的

评估复方利多卡因乳膏对门诊子宫托取出和重新置入时患者疼痛的影响。

方法

在这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验中,在三级转诊中心的泌尿妇科门诊接受常规子宫托护理的参与者被随机分为在更换子宫托前5分钟涂抹4克复方利多卡因乳膏或安慰剂乳膏。在基线、子宫托取出后和子宫托重新置入后收集患者的视觉模拟评分疼痛分数。医生还记录了他们对患者在子宫托取出和重新置入时疼痛程度的估计。主要结局是参与者报告的子宫托取出和重新置入时的视觉模拟评分疼痛分数。计划每组26例样本量(n = 52),以估计子宫托取出时视觉模拟评分疼痛的绝对平均差异为2.1厘米。采用协方差分析来评估作为治疗分配函数的取出和重新置入时的疼痛,并控制基线疼痛。

结果

从2015年7月至2016年2月,筛查了116名女性,招募了54名:复方利多卡因乳膏组2​​8名,安慰剂组26名。复方利多卡因乳膏组的一名患者后来因阴道糜烂退出。参与者均为绝经后女性,平均年龄77.8岁组间大多数特征相似。在调整基线疼痛后,随机分配到复方利多卡因组的参与者与分配到安慰剂组的参与者相比,子宫托取出时的疼痛较低(平均差异 = -2.05,95%置信区间 -3.69至-0.41;P = 0.015)。

结论

门诊子宫托取出时使用复方利多卡因乳膏可减轻患者报告的疼痛。临床医生不妨采用这种简单的干预措施来优化患者的舒适度和依从性。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02380742。

相似文献

1
Anesthetic Cream Use During Office Pessary Removal and Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.门诊子宫托取出与更换时使用麻醉乳膏:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):190-197. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002098.
2
Topical lidocaine for pessary removal and reinsertion pain reduction: a randomized clinical trial.局部用利多卡因减轻子宫托取出和重新插入时的疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;232(3):303.e1-303.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.004. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.宫颈利多卡因-丙胺卡因乳膏对经产妇放置铜T380A宫内节育器时疼痛感知的影响:一项随机双盲对照试验。
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream Compared With Injected Lidocaine for Vulvar Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.利多卡因-丙胺卡因乳膏与注射用利多卡因用于外阴活检的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):311-318. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003660.
5
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream 5% (EMLA) for analgesia prior to cryotherapy of warts in children and adults.一项关于5%复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)用于儿童和成人疣冷冻治疗前镇痛的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Pediatr Dermatol. 1998 Mar-Apr;15(2):129-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1470.1998.1998015129.x.
6
Topical anesthetic (lidocaine-prilocaine) cream application before speculum examination in postmenopausal women.绝经后女性行阴道窥器检查前应用局部麻醉(利多卡因-丙胺卡因)乳膏。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
7
Evaluation of eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for steroid joint injection in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial.对用于幼年类风湿关节炎患儿类固醇关节注射的复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)的评估:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Rheumatol. 2003 Mar;30(3):594-6.
8
Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics reduces pain during intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient.局部麻醉药的共熔混合物可减轻儿科患者静脉置管时的疼痛。
Clin J Pain. 2001 Jun;17(2):115-8. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200106000-00003.
9
The efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine cream to reduce pain in genetic amniocentesis.利多卡因-丙胺卡因乳膏减轻遗传性羊膜腔穿刺术疼痛的疗效。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90(10):1992-6.
10
Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision.利多卡因-丙胺卡因乳膏用于包皮环切术疼痛的疗效与安全性。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 24;336(17):1197-201. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704243361701.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled study comparing the objective efficacy and safety of a novel self-inserted disposable vaginal prolapse device and existing ring pessaries.一项比较新型自插入式一次性阴道脱垂装置与现有环形子宫托客观疗效和安全性的随机对照研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 26;10:1252612. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1252612. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient experience of pain during vaginal pessary removal and insertion: a service evaluation study.患者在阴道栓剂取出和插入过程中的疼痛体验:一项服务评估研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Feb;35(2):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05643-w. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
3
Pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse in women with severe dementia: an ethical challenge.
用于患有严重痴呆症女性盆腔器官脱垂的子宫托:一项伦理挑战。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 May;34(5):1007-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05478-5. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
Shared research priorities for pessary use in women with prolapse: results from a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.子宫托在子宫脱垂女性中应用的共同研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目的结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e021276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021276.