• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在阴道栓剂取出和插入过程中的疼痛体验:一项服务评估研究。

Patient experience of pain during vaginal pessary removal and insertion: a service evaluation study.

机构信息

South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.

University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Feb;35(2):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05643-w. Epub 2023 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-023-05643-w
PMID:37659003
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem affecting women, but there is currently a lack of research focusing on patient experience of pessary changes. This study was aimed at capturing the patient perspective of pessary changes and formally assessing pain during pessary removal and insertion.

METHODS

A service evaluation request was granted by South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust. Patients undergoing pessary change (ring, shelf, or Gellhorn) in gynaecology outpatient clinics over a 6-month period were asked to rate their pain scores on a ten-point numerical pain-rating scale. Other associated data were collected.

RESULTS

Out of 213 women, 58.2% reported that pessary removal was more painful than insertion, 30.5% reported equal pain, and 10.8% reported that insertion was more painful than removal. Pain scores were significantly higher for removal (mean 4.37, median 4, IQR 4-7) than for insertion (mean 2.66, median 2, IQR 2-4, p <0.001). Ring pessaries were significantly less painful to both remove and insert than shelf and Gellhorn pessaries. Smaller pessaries were more painful to both remove and insert. There was no significant difference in pain scores reported by those with or without diagnosed vulval conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Pessary removal causes most women moderate pain, which should be communicated to patients beforehand. Ring pessaries are significantly less painful to change than other pessary types. Clinicians should consider pain as a factor in their decision-making surrounding pessary choice and when counselling patients. Future research should focus on ways to reduce pain during pessary removal.

摘要

引言和假设

盆腔器官脱垂是一种常见的影响女性的问题,但目前缺乏针对患者对子宫托更换体验的研究。本研究旨在从患者的角度了解子宫托更换的情况,并对子宫托取出和插入过程中的疼痛进行正式评估。

方法

South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust 批准了一项服务评估请求。在 6 个月的时间里,在妇科门诊接受子宫托更换(环形、支架或 Gellhorn 型)的患者被要求使用十分制疼痛评分量表对他们的疼痛评分进行评分。还收集了其他相关数据。

结果

在 213 名女性中,58.2%的人报告说子宫托取出比插入更痛,30.5%的人报告说疼痛程度相同,10.8%的人报告说插入比取出更痛。取出时的疼痛评分明显高于插入时(平均 4.37,中位数 4,IQR 4-7)(p<0.001)。与支架和 Gellhorn 型子宫托相比,环形子宫托在取出和插入时的疼痛均明显较轻。较小的子宫托在取出和插入时都更痛。有无诊断性外阴疾病的患者报告的疼痛评分无显著差异。

结论

子宫托取出会给大多数女性带来中度疼痛,应事先告知患者。与其他类型的子宫托相比,环形子宫托更换时疼痛较小。临床医生在决定选择子宫托和向患者提供咨询时,应将疼痛视为一个因素。未来的研究应侧重于减少子宫托取出过程中的疼痛。

相似文献

1
Patient experience of pain during vaginal pessary removal and insertion: a service evaluation study.患者在阴道栓剂取出和插入过程中的疼痛体验:一项服务评估研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Feb;35(2):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05643-w. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
2
Effectiveness and safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse.新型可折叠子宫托治疗盆腔器官脱垂的有效性和安全性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):271.e1-271.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse: evaluation of vaginal discharge and pain during pessary cleaning in an outpatient setting.用于盆腔器官脱垂的子宫托:在门诊环境下评估子宫托清洗时的阴道分泌物和疼痛。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Feb;35(2):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05648-5. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women.用于治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的子宫托(机械装置)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4.
5
Does vaginal estrogen treatment with support pessaries in vaginal prolapse reduce complications?阴道脱垂患者使用支持性子宫托进行阴道雌激素治疗是否能减少并发症?
Post Reprod Health. 2015 Dec;21(4):141-5. doi: 10.1177/2053369115614704. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
The usage of Gellhorn pessary in pelvic organ prolapse and in regards to success, continuity of use and effect on symptoms: a retrospective study of 2 years.Gellhorn 子宫托在盆腔器官脱垂中的应用及其对疗效、使用连续性和症状影响的回顾性研究:2 年随访。
Med J Malaysia. 2023 Nov;78(6):705-710.
7
Successful long-term use of Gellhorn pessary and the effect on symptoms and quality of life in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.成功长期使用 Gellhorn 子宫托对有症状的盆腔器官脱垂女性的症状和生活质量的影响。
Menopause. 2019 Feb;26(2):145-151. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001197.
8
Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.一种无支撑的连续使用环形阴道子宫托治疗绝经后妇女重度盆腔器官脱垂的有效性
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1629-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3586-6. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
9
Factors associated with pessary fitting in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A large prospective cohort study.有症状盆腔器官脱垂女性中与子宫托适配相关的因素:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2238-2245. doi: 10.1002/nau.24477. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
10
Pessary placement and management.子宫托放置与管理
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Dec;46(12):40-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates in Pessary Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Narrative Review.盆腔器官脱垂子宫托治疗的进展:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2737. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082737.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of vaginal estrogen in postmenopausal women using vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse treatment: a randomized controlled trial.绝经后女性使用阴道栓剂治疗盆腔器官脱垂中阴道雌激素的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1833-1838. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04821-y. Epub 2021 May 15.
2
ESTROgen use for complications in women treating pelvic organ prolapse with vaginal PESSaries (ESTRO-PESS)-a randomized clinical trial.ESTRO 方案治疗阴道 PESS 治疗盆腔器官脱垂女性并发症的随机临床试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1571-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04654-1. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women.
用于治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的子宫托(机械装置)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4.
4
Factors associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: Systematic review and metanalysis.与症状性盆腔器官脱垂女性的子宫托适配失败相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Sep;39(7):1912-1921. doi: 10.1002/nau.24458. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Anesthetic Cream Use During Office Pessary Removal and Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.门诊子宫托取出与更换时使用麻醉乳膏:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):190-197. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002098.
6
Effect of vaginal estrogen on pessary use.阴道雌激素对子宫托使用的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3000-1. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
Does vaginal estrogen treatment with support pessaries in vaginal prolapse reduce complications?阴道脱垂患者使用支持性子宫托进行阴道雌激素治疗是否能减少并发症?
Post Reprod Health. 2015 Dec;21(4):141-5. doi: 10.1177/2053369115614704. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Pelvic organ prolapse: an overview.盆腔器官脱垂:概述
JAAPA. 2014 Mar;27(3):20-4; quiz 33. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000443963.00740.4d.
9
Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study.英国经产妇盆腔器官脱垂和尿失禁的初次及再次手术治疗:一项登记链接研究
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000206. Print 2011.
10
Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events.长期阴道环栓剂使用:停药率和不良事件。
BJOG. 2009 Dec;116(13):1715-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02380.x.