Suppr超能文献

口服与静脉注射支链氨基酸后肠促胰岛素反应增加,但胰岛素反应未增加。

Increased Incretin But Not Insulin Response after Oral versus Intravenous Branched Chain Amino Acids.

作者信息

Gojda Jan, Straková Radka, Plíhalová Andrea, Tůma Petr, Potočková Jana, Polák Jan, Anděl Michal

机构信息

Centre for Research on Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition of Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Ann Nutr Metab. 2017;70(4):293-302. doi: 10.1159/000475604. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) are known to exert an insulinotropic effect. Whether this effect is mediated by incretins (glucagon like peptide 1 [GLP-1] or glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide [GIP]) is not known. The aim of this study was to show whether an equivalent dose of BCAA elicits a greater insulin and incretin response when administered orally than intravenously (IV).

METHODS

Eighteen healthy, male subjects participated in 3 tests: IV application of BCAA solution, oral ingestion of BCAA and placebo in an equivalent dose (30.7 ± 1.1 g). Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, valine, leucine and isoleucine concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

Rise in serum BCAA was achieved in both BCAA tests, with incremental areas under the curve (iAUC) being 2.1 times greater for IV BCAA compared with those of the oral BCAA test (p < 0.0001). Oral and IV BCAA induced comparable insulin response greater than placebo (240 min insulin iAUC: oral 3,411 ± 577 vs. IV 2,361 ± 384 vs. placebo 961.2 ± 175 pmol/L, p = 0.0006). Oral BCAA induced higher GLP-1 (p < 0.0001) and GIP response (p < 0.0001) compared with the IV or placebo. Glucose levels declined significantly (p < 0.001) in the same pattern during both BCAA tests with no change in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

An equivalent dose of BCAA elicited a comparable insulin and greater incretin response when administered orally and not when administered through IV. We conclude that insulinotropic effects of BCAA are partially incretin dependent.

摘要

背景/目的:已知支链氨基酸(BCAAs)具有促胰岛素分泌作用。但这种作用是否由肠促胰岛素(胰高血糖素样肽1[GLP - 1]或葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽[GIP])介导尚不清楚。本研究的目的是表明等量的BCAA口服给药时是否比静脉注射(IV)引起更大的胰岛素和肠促胰岛素反应。

方法

18名健康男性受试者参与了3项测试:静脉注射BCAA溶液、口服等量剂量(30.7±1.1 g)的BCAA和安慰剂。测量葡萄糖、胰岛素、C肽、胰高血糖素、GLP - 1、GIP、缬氨酸、亮氨酸和异亮氨酸浓度。

结果

在两项BCAA测试中血清BCAA均升高,静脉注射BCAA的曲线下增量面积(iAUC)比口服BCAA测试大2.1倍(p < 0.0001)。口服和静脉注射BCAA诱导的胰岛素反应相当,均大于安慰剂(240分钟胰岛素iAUC:口服3411±577 vs.静脉注射2361±384 vs.安慰剂961.2±175 pmol/L,p = 0.0006)。与静脉注射或安慰剂相比,口服BCAA诱导更高的GLP - 1反应(p < 0.0001)和GIP反应(p < 0.0001)。在两项BCAA测试中,葡萄糖水平以相同模式显著下降(p < 0.001),安慰剂组无变化。

结论

等量的BCAA口服给药时引起相当的胰岛素反应和更大的肠促胰岛素反应,而静脉注射时则不然。我们得出结论,BCAA的促胰岛素作用部分依赖于肠促胰岛素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验