Exercise Science and Sport Management Department, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S52-S59. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002052.
Evans, TW, McLester, CN, Howard, JS, McLester, JR, and Calloway, JP. Comparison of muscle activation between back squats and belt squats. J Strength Cond Res 33(7S): S52-S59, 2019-A machine belt squat is a piece of equipment designed to allow the performance of squats while loading weight on the lifter's hips using a belt. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether belt squats differ from back squats in activation of the primary movers and to determine the predictive capabilities of back squat load, training status, and anthropometric data on belt squat load. Thirty-one participants (16 men and 15 women) completed anthropometric measurements, a demographic questionnaire, a familiarization visit, and 2 testing visits, completing a 5 repetition maximum test for back squat and belt squat. Surface electromyography was used to measure muscle activation for the left and right vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus (GM). Comparison of muscle activation between the 2 exercises showed significant differences in the left GM (back squat: 0.84 ± 0.45, belt squat: 0.69 ± 0.22, p = 0.015) and right GM (back squat: 0.86 ± 0.45, belt squat: 0.71 ± 0.29, p = 0.004). Regression analysis computed significant prediction equations for belt squat load for general population, men, women, and advanced lifters. Overall, results indicate that belt squats may significantly differ in GM activation from back squats. Back squat load, as well as other variables, may be effective in accurately estimating appropriate belt squat load. These findings may help to more appropriately program for training with machine belt squats as a back squat alternative.
埃文斯、麦克莱斯特、霍华德、麦克莱斯特、杰和考洛威。背蹲和腰带蹲时肌肉激活的比较。J 力量与调节研究 33(7S):S52-S59,2019-机器腰带深蹲是一种设备,旨在允许举重者在使用腰带将重量加载到臀部时进行深蹲。本研究的目的是确定腰带深蹲是否与背蹲在主要运动者的激活方面有所不同,并确定背蹲负荷、训练状态和人体测量数据对腰带深蹲负荷的预测能力。31 名参与者(16 名男性和 15 名女性)完成了人体测量、人口统计问卷调查、熟悉访问和 2 次测试访问,完成了 5 次重复最大测试的背蹲和腰带深蹲。表面肌电图用于测量左侧和右侧股直肌、股外侧肌、股直肌和臀大肌(GM)的肌肉激活。两种运动之间的肌肉激活比较显示,左侧 GM(背蹲:0.84±0.45,腰带蹲:0.69±0.22,p=0.015)和右侧 GM(背蹲:0.86±0.45,腰带蹲:0.71±0.29,p=0.004)存在显著差异。回归分析为一般人群、男性、女性和高级举重者计算了腰带深蹲负荷的显著预测方程。总体而言,结果表明,腰带深蹲可能在 GM 激活方面与背深蹲存在显著差异。背蹲负荷以及其他变量可能在准确估计适当的腰带深蹲负荷方面非常有效。这些发现可能有助于更恰当地计划使用机器腰带深蹲作为背深蹲的替代方案进行训练。