Suppr超能文献

2010 年至 2014 年纽约市因癌症、肺炎或糖尿病导致的死亡原因数据质量检查。

Examination of Cause-of-Death Data Quality Among New York City Deaths Due to Cancer, Pneumonia, or Diabetes From 2010 to 2014.

机构信息

Bureau of Vital Statistics, Division of Epidemiology, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 1;187(1):144-152. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx207.

Abstract

The cause-of-death (COD) statement on the standard US death certificate is a valuable tool for public health practice, but its utility is impaired by reporting inaccuracies. To assess the quality of CODs reported in New York City, we developed and applied a quality measure to 3 leading CODs: cancer, pneumonia, and diabetes. The COD quality measure characterized 5 common issues with COD completion: nonspecific conditions as the underlying COD (UCOD); UCOD discrepancies; the presence of only 1 informative cause on the entire certificate; competing causes listed together on 1 line; and clinically improbable sequences. COD statements with more than 1 quality issue were defined as statements of "limited" quality. Of 82,116 deaths with cancer, diabetes, or pneumonia assigned as the UCOD in New York City from 2010 to 2014, 66.8% of pneumonia certificates were classified as "limited" quality as compared with 45.6% of cancer certificates and 32.3% of diabetes certificates. Forty percent of cancer certificates listed only 1 informative condition on the death certificate. Almost half of pneumonia certificates (45.9%) contained only enough information to assign International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code J18.9 ("unspecified pneumonia") as the UCOD, whereas most diabetes certificates contained UCOD discrepancies (25.2%). These limitations affect the quality of mortality data but may be reduced through quality improvement efforts.

摘要

美国标准死亡证明上的死因(COD)陈述是公共卫生实践的有用工具,但由于报告不准确,其效用受到影响。为了评估纽约市报告的 COD 的质量,我们开发并应用了一种质量衡量标准来衡量 3 种主要的 COD:癌症、肺炎和糖尿病。COD 质量衡量标准描述了 COD 完成的 5 个常见问题:基础 COD(UCOD)为非特异性条件;UCOD 差异;整个证书上只有 1 个有信息的原因;在同 1 行上列出的多个竞争性原因;以及临床不太可能的序列。COD 语句有超过 1 个质量问题的定义为“有限”质量的语句。在 2010 年至 2014 年期间,纽约市将癌症、糖尿病或肺炎作为 UCOD 的 82116 例死亡中,45.6%的癌症证书被归类为“有限”质量,而 66.8%的肺炎证书和 32.3%的糖尿病证书被归类为“有限”质量。40%的癌症证书在死亡证明上只列出了 1 种有信息的情况。近一半的肺炎证书(45.9%)只包含足够的信息来将国际疾病分类,第十版,代码 J18.9(“未特指的肺炎”)作为 UCOD,而大多数糖尿病证书包含 UCOD 差异(25.2%)。这些限制影响了死亡率数据的质量,但可以通过质量改进努力来降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验