Makroo Raj Nath, Agrawal Soma, Chowdhry Mohit
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2017 Jun;33(2):264-270. doi: 10.1007/s12288-016-0704-9. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
There is paucity of literature regarding efficacy of transfusion of Rh and Kell matched blood in reducing alloimmunization risk among non-chronically transfused patients. A prospective study to compare efficacy of Rh and Kell phenotype matched blood over randomly selected and conventionally cross-matched blood on the incidence of alloimmunization in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was carried out in the Department of Transfusion Medicine at Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, from 1st September, 2013 to 31st December, 2014. Two groups, A and B of 250 each were studied. Group A received ABO, Rh and Kell phenotype matched units. Group B received units matched only for ABO and Rh D. Retrospective analysis for antigenic exposures was done. Alloimmunization rate was evaluated for both groups after 72 h and 4 weeks and compared. A value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. None of the patients in Group A were alloimmunized. In Group B, 119 patients received antigenic stimulus (single antigen stimuli- 93; multiple- 26). The probability of a patient being exposed was 52.4 %. At 6 weeks post transfusion, one patient developed 'Anti-E' and had received 'E' stimulus once. The rate of alloimmunization was 0.4 % in group B, 0.8 % overall and the risk of alloimmunization per unit transfused was 0.17 %. Non responders were 99.16 %. The study did not reach statistical significance ( = 0.238). Majority of our population are non-responders therefore, the resources and time can be reserved for providing Rh and Kell matched units for multiply transfused patients.
关于输注Rh和Kell血型匹配的血液在降低非长期输血患者同种免疫风险方面的疗效,相关文献较少。2013年9月1日至2014年12月31日,在新德里英迪拉普拉萨阿波罗医院输血医学科进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较Rh和Kell血型表型匹配的血液与随机选择并按常规交叉配血的血液在心脏手术患者同种免疫发生率方面的疗效。研究对象分为A、B两组,每组各250例。A组输注ABO、Rh和Kell血型表型匹配的血液单位。B组仅输注ABO和Rh D血型匹配的血液单位。对抗原暴露情况进行回顾性分析。在72小时和4周后评估两组的同种免疫率并进行比较。P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。A组患者均未发生同种免疫。B组中,119例患者接受了抗原刺激(单一抗原刺激 - 93例;多种抗原刺激 - 26例)。患者接受抗原刺激的概率为52.4%。输血后6周,1例患者产生了“抗 - E”抗体,且该患者曾接受过1次“E”抗原刺激。B组的同种免疫率为0.4%,总体为0.8%,每输注一个单位血液发生同种免疫的风险为0.17%。无反应者占99.16%。该研究未达到统计学意义(P = 0.238)。由于我们研究的大多数人群为无反应者,因此可以保留资源和时间,为多次输血的患者提供Rh和Kell血型匹配的血液单位。