Fan Lu, Brett Michael T, Jiang Wenju, Li Bo
College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610066, China.
Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Environ Pollut. 2017 Oct;229:255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.093. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
The objective of this study was to determine the composition of nitrogen (N) in the effluents of advanced N removal (ANR) wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This study also tested two different experimental protocols for determining dissolved N recalcitrance. An analysis of 15 effluent samples from five WWTPs, showed effluent concentrations and especially effluent composition varied greatly from one system to the other, with total nitrogen (TN) ranging between 1.05 and 8.10 mg L. Nitrate (NO) accounted for between 38 ± 32% of TN, and ammonium accounted for a further 29 ± 28%. All of these samples were dominated by dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN; NO + NH), and uptake experiments indicated the DIN fraction was as expected highly bioavailable. Dissolved organic N (DON) accounted for 20 ± 11% for the total dissolved N in these effluents, and uptake experiments indicated the bioavailability of this fraction varied between 27 ± 26% depending on the WWTP assessed. These results indicate near complete DIN removal should be the primary goal of ANR treatment systems. The comparison of bioavailable nitrogen (BAN) quantification protocols showed that the dissolved nitrogen uptake bioassay approach was clearly a more reliable way to determine BAN concentrations compared to the conventional cell yield protocol. Moreover, because the nitrogen uptake experiment was much more sensitive, this protocol made it easier to detect extrinsic factors (such as biological contamination or toxicity) that could affect the accuracy of these bioassays. Based on these results, we recommend the nitrogen uptake bioassay using filtered and autoclaved samples to quantify BAN concentrations. However, for effluent samples indicating toxicity, algal bioassays will not accurately quantify BAN.
本研究的目的是确定深度脱氮(ANR)污水处理厂(WWTPs)出水的氮(N)组成。本研究还测试了两种不同的实验方案来测定溶解性氮的难降解性。对来自五个污水处理厂的15个出水样本的分析表明,不同系统之间的出水浓度,尤其是出水组成差异很大,总氮(TN)范围在1.05至8.10mg/L之间。硝酸盐(NO)占TN的38±32%,铵盐占另外的29±28%。所有这些样本都以溶解性无机氮(DIN;NO + NH)为主,吸收实验表明DIN部分具有预期的高生物可利用性。溶解性有机氮(DON)占这些出水总溶解性氮的20±11%,吸收实验表明该部分的生物可利用性因所评估的污水处理厂而异,在27±26%之间。这些结果表明,近乎完全去除DIN应是ANR处理系统的主要目标。生物可利用氮(BAN)定量方案的比较表明,与传统的细胞产量方案相比,溶解性氮吸收生物测定法显然是一种更可靠的测定BAN浓度的方法。此外,由于氮吸收实验更敏感,该方案更容易检测到可能影响这些生物测定准确性的外在因素(如生物污染或毒性)。基于这些结果,我们建议使用经过过滤和高压灭菌的样本进行氮吸收生物测定来量化BAN浓度。然而,对于显示有毒性的出水样本,藻类生物测定法无法准确量化BAN。