Aguirre-Villegas H A, Passos-Fonseca T H, Reinemann D J, Larson R
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
Agroecology Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6804-6821. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12325. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Dairy products are major components of the human diet but are also important contributors to global environmental impacts. This study evaluated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, net energy intensity (NEI), and land use of confined dairy systems with increasing levels of pasture in the diet. A Wisconsin farm was modeled to represent practices adopted by dairy operations in a humid continental climate typical in the Great Lakes region and other climates that have large differences in seasonal temperatures. Five grazing scenarios (all of which contained some portion of confinement) were modeled based on different concentrations of dry matter intake from pasture and feed supplementation from corn grain, corn silage, and soybean meal. Scenarios that incorporate grazing consisted of 5 mo of pasture feeding from May to September and 7 mo of confined feeding from October to April. Environmental impacts were compared within the 5 scenarios that incorporate grazing and across 2 entirely confined scenarios with and without on-farm electricity production through anaerobic digestion (AD). To conduct a fair comparison, all scenarios were evaluated based on the same total amount of milk produced per day where resource inputs were adjusted according to the characteristics of each scenario. A cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment evaluated the environmental burdens that were partitioned by allocation between milk and meat and by system expansion when biogas-based electricity was produced. Overall, results for all scenarios were comparable. Enteric methane was the greatest contributor to GHG emissions, and the production of crops was the most energy-intense process. For the confined scenario without AD, GHG emissions were 0.87 kg of CO equivalents, NEI was 1.59 MJ, and land use was 1.59 m/kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). Anaerobic digestion significantly reduced emissions to 0.28 kg of CO equivalents/kg of FPCM and reduced NEI to -1.26 MJ/kg of FPCM, indicating a net energy producing system and highlighting the potential of AD to improve the sustainability of confined systems. For scenarios that combined confinement and grazing, GHG emissions ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 kg of CO equivalents, NEI ranged from 1.42 to 1.59 MJ, and land use ranged from 1.19 to 1.26 m/kg of FPCM. All environmental impacts were minimized in scenarios that supplemented enough feed to increase milk yield but maintained dry matter intake from pasture at a level high enough to reduce material and energy use.
乳制品是人类饮食的主要组成部分,但也是全球环境影响的重要贡献者。本研究评估了日粮中牧场比例增加的封闭式奶牛养殖系统的温室气体(GHG)排放、净能量强度(NEI)和土地利用情况。以威斯康星州的一个农场为模型,代表五大湖地区典型的湿润大陆性气候以及季节性温度差异较大的其他气候条件下奶牛养殖场采用的做法。基于来自牧场的干物质摄入量以及玉米谷物、玉米青贮饲料和豆粕补充饲料的不同浓度,模拟了五种放牧情景(所有情景都包含一定比例的圈养)。包含放牧的情景包括5月至9月的5个月牧场饲养以及10月至4月的7个月圈养饲养。在包含放牧的5种情景以及2种完全圈养情景(有无通过厌氧消化(AD)进行农场发电)之间比较环境影响。为了进行公平比较,所有情景均基于每天相同的牛奶总产量进行评估,其中资源投入根据每种情景的特点进行调整。从摇篮到农场大门的生命周期评估评估了通过牛奶和肉类之间的分配以及生产基于沼气的电力时通过系统扩展划分的环境负担。总体而言,所有情景的结果具有可比性。肠道甲烷是温室气体排放的最大贡献者,作物生产是能源强度最高的过程。对于没有AD的圈养情景,温室气体排放为0.87千克二氧化碳当量,净能量强度为1.59兆焦,土地利用为每千克脂肪和蛋白质校正乳(FPCM)1.59平方米。厌氧消化显著将排放量降低至0.28千克二氧化碳当量/千克FPCM,并将净能量强度降低至-1.26兆焦/千克FPCM,表明这是一个净能量生产系统,并突出了AD改善圈养系统可持续性的潜力。对于结合了圈养和放牧的情景,温室气体排放范围为0.84至0.92千克二氧化碳当量,净能量强度范围为1.42至1.59兆焦,土地利用范围为1.19至1.26平方米/千克FPCM。在补充足够饲料以提高牛奶产量但将牧场干物质摄入量维持在足以减少物质和能源使用的高水平的情景中,所有环境影响均降至最低。