Emergency Department, Changhua Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan, ROC.
Chong Guang Clinic, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Aug;80(8):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
This study aimed to investigate video-guided laryngoscopy for nasogastric tube placement.
This was an observational comparative study performed in a hospital. The participants included volunteers from the medical staff (physicians and nurses) experienced with nasogastric intubation, and non-medical staff (medical students, pharmacists and emergent medical technicians) with knowledge of nasogastric intubation but lacking procedural experience. Medical and non-medical hospital staff performed manual, laryngoscope-assisted and video-guided laryngoscope nasogastric intubation both in the presence and in the absence of an endotracheal tube, using a manikin. Nasogastric intubation times were compared between groups and methods.
Using the video-guided laryngoscope resulted in a significantly shorter intubation time compared to the other 2 methods, both with and without an endotracheal tube, for the medical and non-medical staff alike (all p < 0.05). For the medical staff, mean nasogastric intubation time was significantly shorter using video-guided laryngoscope without endotracheal intubation, direct laryngoscope with endotracheal intubation and video-guided laryngoscope with endotracheal intubation compared to manual intubation without endotracheal intubation (0.49, 0.63 and 0.72 vs. 5.63, respectively, p ≤ 0.008). For non-medical staff, nasogastric intubation time was significantly shorter using video-guided laryngoscope without endotracheal intubation, direct laryngoscope with endotracheal intubation and video-guided laryngoscope with endotracheal intubation compared to manual intubation without endotracheal intubation (1.67, 1.58 and 0.95 vs. 6.9, respectively, p ≤ 0.002). And mean nasogastric intubation time for video-guided laryngoscope endotracheal intubation was significantly shorter for medical staff than for non-medical staff (0.49 vs. 1.67 min, respectively, p = 0.041).
Video-guided laryngoscope reduces nasogastric intubation time compared to manual and direct laryngoscope intubation, which promotes a consistent technique when performed by experienced medical and previously untrained non-medical staff.
本研究旨在探讨视频引导喉镜在鼻胃管置管中的应用。
这是一项在医院进行的观察性对比研究。参与者包括有经验的鼻胃管插管的医务人员(医生和护士)和有鼻胃管插管知识但缺乏操作经验的非医务人员(医学生、药剂师和紧急医疗技术人员)。医务人员和非医务人员在有无气管插管的情况下,使用模型,分别进行手动、喉镜辅助和视频引导喉镜下的鼻胃管插管。比较各组和方法的鼻胃管插管时间。
与其他 2 种方法相比,视频引导喉镜在有和无气管插管的情况下,均能显著缩短插管时间,无论是医务人员还是非医务人员(均 p<0.05)。对于医务人员,与无气管插管的手动插管相比,无气管插管的视频引导喉镜、带气管插管的直接喉镜和带气管插管的视频引导喉镜的平均鼻胃管插管时间明显更短(0.49、0.63 和 0.72 与 5.63 相比,p≤0.008)。对于非医务人员,与无气管插管的手动插管相比,无气管插管的视频引导喉镜、带气管插管的直接喉镜和带气管插管的视频引导喉镜的鼻胃管插管时间明显更短(1.67、1.58 和 0.95 与 6.9 相比,p≤0.002)。并且,医务人员的视频引导喉镜带气管插管的平均鼻胃管插管时间明显短于非医务人员(0.49 与 1.67 分钟,p=0.041)。
与手动和直接喉镜插管相比,视频引导喉镜可缩短鼻胃管插管时间,这促进了有经验的医务人员和未经训练的非医务人员在操作时使用一致的技术。