Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Édouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France.
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Aug;81:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
For early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), optimal chemotherapy regimen and the number of cycles to be delivered remain to settle down. The H9-U trial compared three modalities of chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in patients with stage I-II HL and risk factors (NCT00005584).
Patients aged 15-70 years with untreated supradiaphragmatic HL with at least one risk factor (age ≥ 50, involvement of 4-5 nodal areas, mediastinum/thoracic ratio ≥ 0.35, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 50 without B-symptoms or ESR ≥ 30 and B-symptoms) were eligible for the randomised, open label, multicentre, non-inferiority H9-U trial. The limit of non-inferiority was set at 10% for the difference between 5-year event-free survival (EFS) estimates. From October 1998 to September 2002, 808 patients were randomised to receive either the control arm 6-ABVD-IFRT (n = 276), or one of the two experimental arms: 4-ABVD-IFRT (n = 277) or 4-BEACOPP-IFRT (n = 255).
Results in the 4-ABVD-IFRT (5-year EFS, 85.9%) and the 4-BEACOPP-IFRT (5-year EFS, 88.8%) were not inferior to 6-ABVD-IFRT (5-year EFS, 89.9%): difference of 4.0% (90%CI, -0.7%-8.8%) and of 1.1% (90%CI,-3.5%-5.6%) respectively. The 5-year overall survival estimates were 94%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Patients treated with combined modality treatment chemotherapeutic regimen comprising doxorubicin (Adriamycin), bleomycin, vincristine (Oncovin), cyclophosphamide, procarbazine, etoposide and prednisone (BEACOPP) more often developed serious adverse events requiring supportive measures and hospitalisation compared with patients receiving the chemotherapeutic regimen comprising doxorubicin (Adriamycin), bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD).
The trial demonstrates that 4-ABVD followed by IFRT yields high disease control in patients with early-stage HL and risk factors responding to chemotherapy. Although non-inferior in terms of efficacy, four cycles of BEACOPP were more toxic than four or six cycles of ABVD.
对于早期霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL),仍需确定最佳的化疗方案和疗程数。H9-U 试验比较了三种化疗方案加受累野放疗(IFRT)在 I-II 期 HL 伴高危因素患者中的疗效(NCT00005584)。
1998 年 10 月至 2002 年 9 月,共纳入 808 例未经治疗的膈上 HL 患者,且至少有一个高危因素(年龄≥50 岁、累及 4-5 个淋巴结区、纵隔/胸廓比≥0.35、无 B 症状的红细胞沉降率[ESR]≥50 或有 B 症状的 ESR≥30),按 1:1:1 随机分为三组,分别接受 6-ABVD-IFRT(n=276)、4-ABVD-IFRT(n=277)或 4-BEACOPP-IFRT(n=255)治疗。试验的非劣效界值设定为 5 年无事件生存(EFS)率的差值 10%。
4-ABVD-IFRT(5 年 EFS,85.9%)和 4-BEACOPP-IFRT(5 年 EFS,88.8%)的疗效与 6-ABVD-IFRT(5 年 EFS,89.9%)相当:差值分别为 4.0%(90%CI,-0.7%8.8%)和 1.1%(90%CI,-3.5%5.6%)。5 年总生存估计值分别为 94%、93%和 93%。与接受 ABVD 方案(多柔比星[阿霉素]、博来霉素、长春新碱[Oncovin]、环磷酰胺、洛莫司汀、依托泊苷和泼尼松)治疗的患者相比,接受 BEACOPP 方案(多柔比星[阿霉素]、博来霉素、长春碱和达卡巴嗪)治疗的患者更常发生需要支持治疗和住院的严重不良事件。
该试验表明,在早期 HL 伴高危因素患者中,4-ABVD 序贯 IFRT 可获得较高的疾病控制率。虽然在疗效方面不劣效,但与 4 或 6 个周期的 ABVD 相比,4 个周期的 BEACOPP 方案毒性更大。