Jarrar Mohamed Salah, Chouchène Ibrahim, Fadhl Houssem, Ghrissi Rafik, Elghali Amine, Ferhi Fehmi, Mraidha Hedi, Hamila Fehmi, Letaief Rached
Tunis Med. 2016 Aug-Sep;94(8-9):519-524.
It is established that the standard treatment for lithiasic acute cholecystitis is the laparoscopic cholecystectomie. However, the question of the timing of cholecystectomy remains controversial.
To compare early laparoscopic cholecystectomies (within 72 hours of symptom onset) and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomies (beyond 72 hours) for lithiasic acute cholecystitis in terms of intra-operative difficulties and post-operative complications.
The patients operated on for acute cholecystitis, between January 2007 and December 2012, were included in a retrospective study. They were divided into two groups based on whether surgery was performed before (group A) or after (group B) 72 hours after the onset of symptoms. We conducted a comparison between the two groups.
The two groups were comparable in terms of background, clinico-biological presentation, and radiological findings. The average time of surgery was 111.6 hours after symptom onset. Duration of surgery was significantly longer for group B (97 minutes versus 82.17 minutes, p = 0.003). There was more conversion in group B than in group A, without significant difference (20% versus 11.6%, p = 0.14). There were no deaths in our series. Specific post-operative complications were comparable between the two groups (wound infection: 3 (B) versus 1 (A), biliary fistula: 8 (B) versus 0 (A), p = Non significant). The post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in group B (3.34 days versus 1.84, p <10-3).
In case of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the conversion rate and post-operative morbidity are comparable to the delayed treatment of acute cholecystitis. But the early surgery can reduce the cost of care, the duration of surgery and the hospital stay. Key-words : Lithiasic acute cholecystitis ; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
已确定结石性急性胆囊炎的标准治疗方法是腹腔镜胆囊切除术。然而,胆囊切除术的时机问题仍存在争议。
比较早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(症状发作72小时内)和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术(超过72小时)治疗结石性急性胆囊炎在术中困难和术后并发症方面的情况。
对2007年1月至2012年12月期间接受急性胆囊炎手术的患者进行回顾性研究。根据症状发作后72小时之前(A组)或之后(B组)是否进行手术将他们分为两组。我们对两组进行了比较。
两组在背景、临床生物学表现和影像学检查结果方面具有可比性。症状发作后平均手术时间为111.6小时。B组手术时间明显更长(97分钟对82.17分钟,p = 0.003)。B组中转率高于A组,但无显著差异(20%对11.6%,p = 0.14)。我们的系列研究中无死亡病例。两组特定的术后并发症相当(伤口感染:B组3例对A组1例,胆瘘:B组8例对A组0例,p = 无显著差异)。B组术后住院时间明显更长(3.34天对1.84天,p <10-3)。
对于早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其转化率和术后发病率与急性胆囊炎的延迟治疗相当。但早期手术可降低护理成本、缩短手术时间和住院时间。关键词:结石性急性胆囊炎;腹腔镜胆囊切除术。