McCarthy Angela, Coleborne Catharine, O'Connor Maree, Knewstubb Elspeth
1Department of History and Art History,University of Otago,Dunedin,New Zealand.
2School of Humanities and Social Science,Faculty of Education and Arts,University of Newcastle,University Drive,Callaghan,NSW 2308,Australia.
Med Hist. 2017 Jul;61(3):358-379. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2017.33.
This article examines the research implications and uses of data for a large project investigating institutional confinement in Australia and New Zealand. The cases of patients admitted between 1864 and 1910 at four separate institutions, three public and one private, provided more than 4000 patient records to a collaborative team of researchers. The utility and longevity of this data and the ways to continue to understand its significance and contents form the basis of this article's interrogation of data collection and methodological issues surrounding the history of psychiatry and mental health. It examines the themes of ethics and access, record linkage, categories of data analysis, comparison and record keeping across colonial and imperial institutions, and constraints and opportunities in the data itself. The aim of this article is to continue an ongoing conversation among historians of mental health about the role and value of data collection for mental health and to signal the relevance of international multi-sited collaborative research in this field.
本文探讨了一个大型项目的数据研究意义及用途,该项目旨在调查澳大利亚和新西兰的机构监禁情况。1864年至1910年间,四家不同机构(三家公立机构和一家私立机构)收治的患者病例为一个研究团队提供了4000多份患者记录。这些数据的效用和持久性,以及继续理解其意义和内容的方法,构成了本文对围绕精神病学和心理健康历史的数据收集及方法问题进行审视的基础。本文探讨了伦理与获取、记录关联、数据分析类别、跨殖民地和帝国机构的比较与记录保存等主题,以及数据本身的限制与机遇。本文的目的是延续心理健康史学家之间关于数据收集对心理健康的作用和价值的持续讨论,并表明国际多地点合作研究在该领域的相关性。