Suppr超能文献

卵巢癌与合并症:生存不佳是由初始治疗的选择还是系统延误导致的?

Ovarian Cancer and Comorbidity: Is Poor Survival Explained by Choice of Primary Treatment or System Delay?

作者信息

Noer Mette Calundann, Sperling Cecilie Dyg, Ottesen Bent, Antonsen Sofie Leisby, Christensen Ib Jarle, Høgdall Claus

机构信息

*Department of Gynecology, the Research Unit of Women and Children's Health, Juliane Marie Centret, Rigshospitalet; †Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, the Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen; and ‡Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jul;27(6):1123-1133. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Comorbidity influences survival in ovarian cancer, but the causal relations between prognosis and comorbidity are not well characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between comorbidity, system delay, the choice of primary treatment, and survival in Danish ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

This population-based study was conducted on data from 5317 ovarian cancer patients registered in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. Comorbidity was classified according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Ovarian Cancer Comorbidity Index. Pearson χ test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between comorbidity and primary outcome measures: primary treatment ("primary debulking surgery" vs "no primary surgery") and system delay (more vs less than required by the National Cancer Patient Pathways [NCPPs]). Cox regression analyses, including hypothesized mediators stepwise, were used to investigate if the impact of comorbidity on overall survival is mediated by the choice of treatment or system delay.

RESULTS

A total of 3945 patients (74.2%) underwent primary debulking surgery, whereas 1160 (21.8%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. When adjusting for confounders, comorbidity was not significantly associated to the choice of treatment. Surgically treated patients with moderate/severe comorbidity were more often experiencing system delay longer than required by the NCPP. No association between comorbidity and system delay was observed for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival analyses demonstrated that system delay longer than NCPP requirement positively impacts survival (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98]), whereas primary treatment modality has no significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate/severe comorbidity experience often a longer system delay than patients with no or mild comorbidity. Age, stage, and comorbidity are factors influencing the choice of treatment, with stage being the most important factor and comorbidity of lesser importance. The impact of comorbidity on survival does not seem to be mediated by the choice of treatment or system delay.

摘要

目的

合并症会影响卵巢癌患者的生存,但预后与合并症之间的因果关系尚未得到充分阐明。本研究旨在调查丹麦卵巢癌患者的合并症、系统延误、初始治疗选择与生存之间的关联。

方法

本基于人群的研究使用了丹麦妇科癌症数据库中登记的5317例卵巢癌患者的数据。根据Charlson合并症指数和卵巢癌合并症指数对合并症进行分类。采用Pearson χ检验和多因素逻辑回归分析来研究合并症与主要结局指标之间的关联:初始治疗(“初始肿瘤细胞减灭术”与“无初始手术”)和系统延误(超过与未超过国家癌症患者诊疗路径[NCPPs]的要求)。采用逐步纳入假设中介变量的Cox回归分析,来研究合并症对总生存的影响是否由治疗选择或系统延误介导。

结果

共有3945例患者(74.2%)接受了初始肿瘤细胞减灭术,而1160例(21.8%)接受了新辅助化疗。在对混杂因素进行校正后,合并症与治疗选择无显著关联。接受手术治疗的中度/重度合并症患者比NCPP要求的时间更常出现系统延误。在接受新辅助化疗的患者中,未观察到合并症与系统延误之间的关联。生存分析表明,超过NCPP要求的系统延误对生存有正向影响(风险比,0.90[95%置信区间,0.82 - 0.98]),而初始治疗方式对生存无显著影响。

结论

中度/重度合并症患者比无合并症或轻度合并症患者更常出现更长的系统延误。年龄、分期和合并症是影响治疗选择的因素,其中分期是最重要的因素,合并症的重要性相对较小。合并症对生存的影响似乎并非由治疗选择或系统延误介导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验