Schubert Teresa, Badcock Nicholas, Kohnen Saskia
ARC (Australian Research Council) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
ARC (Australian Research Council) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Letter recognition and digit recognition are critical skills for literate adults, yet few studies have considered the development of these skills in children. We conducted a nine-alternative forced-choice (9AFC) partial report task with strings of letters and digits, with typographical symbols (e.g., $, @) as a control, to investigate the development of identity and position processing in children. This task allows for the delineation of identity processing (as overall accuracy) and position coding (as the proportion of position errors). Our participants were students in Grade 1 to Grade 6, allowing us to track the development of these abilities across the primary school years. Our data suggest that although digit processing and letter processing end up with many similarities in adult readers, the developmental trajectories for identity and position processing for the two character types differ. Symbol processing showed little developmental change in terms of identity or position accuracy. We discuss the implications of our results for theories of identity and position coding: modified receptive field, multiple-route model, and lexical tuning. Despite moderate success for some theories, considerable theoretical work is required to explain the developmental trajectories of letter processing and digit processing, which might not be as closely tied in child readers as they are in adult readers.
字母识别和数字识别是有读写能力的成年人的关键技能,但很少有研究考虑过儿童这些技能的发展情况。我们用一串字母、数字以及印刷符号(如$、@)作为对照,进行了一项九选一强制选择(9AFC)部分报告任务,以研究儿童身份和位置处理能力的发展。这项任务能够区分身份处理(以总体准确率衡量)和位置编码(以位置错误比例衡量)。我们的参与者是一年级到六年级的学生,这使我们能够追踪这些能力在小学阶段的发展情况。我们的数据表明,虽然数字处理和字母处理在成年读者中最终有许多相似之处,但这两种字符类型在身份和位置处理方面的发展轨迹有所不同。符号处理在身份或位置准确性方面几乎没有发展变化。我们讨论了研究结果对身份和位置编码理论的影响:修正感受野、多路径模型和词汇调整。尽管某些理论取得了一定成功,但仍需要大量理论工作来解释字母处理和数字处理的发展轨迹,在儿童读者中,它们的联系可能不像成年读者那样紧密。