Pulmonary vein potential mapping in atrial fibrillation with high density and standard spiral (lasso) catheters: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND

The dominant single-shot procedure for Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) is the Cryoballoon Ablation (CBA) technique using a spiral catheter (Achieve™, AC) for mapping and monitoring purposes. We hypothesized that Basket Catheters, such as the High Density Mesh Mapper (HDMM), with its high-density mapping properties, could detect Pulmonary Vein Potentials (PVPs) that the octapolar AC would not be able to identify.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (average age 61.8±10 years) with either paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (Paroxysmal AF or Persistent AF) were enrolled in the study. While the patients were in sinus rhythm, all pulmonary veins (PVs) were prospectively mapped both prior and subsequent to CBA with a 32-pole HDMM and an 8-pole AC. PVPs were recorded using both catheters, and their location was allocated to one of four PV quadrants. Then, the quadrant findings of the mapping catheters were compared.

RESULTS

Mapping using the HDMM allowed for more precise identification of PVPs both before and after CBA compared to AC mapping. We identified an average of 83.6±4.8 PVPs in all four PVs (this means 20.9±10.5 PVPs /per single PV per patient [HDMM], 14.5±1.3 PVPs/in all four PVs and 3.6±2.7 PVPs /per single PV per patient [AC]) before ablation, thereby leading to a significant difference in the identification of PVPs per PV quadrant. Of 384 PV quadrants/24 patients analyzed, the HDMM identified PVPs in 279 and AC in only 192 quadrants (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

High-density mapping with a Basket Catheter, such as the HDMM, detects PVPs that remain undetected when using the standard AC catheter in CBA procedures.