Schmid Samuel L, Bachmann Elias, Fischer Michael, Meyer Dominik C, Gerber Christoph A, Snedeker Jess G, Farshad Mazda
Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
Laboratory for Orthopedic Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):212-216. doi: 10.1002/jor.23631. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Achieving sufficient mechanical purchase of pedicle screws in osteoporotic or previously instrumented bone is technically and biologically challenging. Techniques using different kinds of pedicle screws or methods of cement augmentation have been used to address this challenge, but are associated with difficult revisions and complications. The purpose of this biomechanical trial was to investigate the use of biocompatible textile materials in combination with bone cement to augment pullout strength of pedicle screws while reducing the risk of cement extrusion. Pedicle screws (6/40 mm) were either augmented with standard bone-cement (Palacos LV + G) in one group (BC, n = 13) or with bone-cement enforced by Vicryl mesh in another group (BCVM, n = 13) in osteoporosis-like saw bone blocks. Pullout testing was subsequently performed. In a second experimental phase, similar experiments were performed using human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (n = 10). In osteoporosis-like saw bone blocks, a mean screw pullout force of 350 N (±125) was significantly higher with the Bone cement (BC) compared to bone-cement enforced by Vicryl mesh (BCVM) technique with 240 N (±64) (p = 0.030). In human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae the mean screw pullout force was 784 ± 366 N with BC and not statistically different to BCVM with 757 ± 303 N (p = 0.836). Importantly, cement extrusion was only observed in the BC group (40%) and never with the BCVM technique. In vitro textile reinforcement of bone cement for pedicle screw augmentation successfully reduced cement extrusion compared to conventionally delivered bone cement. The mechanical strength of textile delivered cement constructs was more reproducible than standard cementing. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:212-216, 2018.
在骨质疏松或先前已植入器械的骨骼中,实现椎弓根螺钉足够的机械锚固在技术和生物学方面都具有挑战性。已采用使用不同类型椎弓根螺钉或骨水泥增强方法的技术来应对这一挑战,但这些技术与困难的翻修手术和并发症相关。本生物力学试验的目的是研究生物相容性纺织材料与骨水泥联合使用,以增强椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度,同时降低骨水泥挤出的风险。在类似骨质疏松的锯骨块中,一组(BC,n = 13)的椎弓根螺钉(6/40 mm)用标准骨水泥(Palacos LV + G)增强,另一组(BCVM,n = 13)用由维可牢尼龙网增强的骨水泥增强。随后进行拔出测试。在第二个实验阶段,使用人类尸体腰椎(n = 10)进行了类似实验。在类似骨质疏松的锯骨块中,与采用维可牢尼龙网增强骨水泥(BCVM)技术的240 N(±64)相比,骨水泥(BC)组的平均螺钉拔出力350 N(±125)显著更高(p = 0.030)。在人类尸体腰椎中,BC组的平均螺钉拔出力为784 ± 366 N,与BCVM组的757 ± 303 N无统计学差异(p = 0.836)。重要的是,仅在BC组观察到骨水泥挤出(40%),而BCVM技术从未出现这种情况。与传统输送的骨水泥相比,用于增强椎弓根螺钉的骨水泥的体外纺织增强成功减少了骨水泥挤出。纺织输送骨水泥结构的机械强度比标准骨水泥更具可重复性。© 2017年矫形外科学研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科学研究杂志》36:212 - 216,2018年。