Akay Catherine L, Albarracin Constance, Torstenson Tiffany, Bassett Roland, Mittendorf Elizabeth A, Yi Min, Kuerer Henry M, Babiera Gildy V, Bedrosian Isabelle, Hunt Kelly K, Hwang Rosa F
Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Breast J. 2018 Jan;24(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12829. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is a standard axillary staging technique in breast cancer and intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment is important for decision-making regarding additional treatment and reconstruction. This study was undertaken to investigate clinicopathologic factors impacting the accuracy of intraoperative SLN evaluation. Records of patients with clinically node-negative, invasive breast cancer who underwent SLND with frozen section intraoperative pathologic evaluation from 2004 to 2007 were reviewed. Intraoperative SLN assessment results were compared to final pathology. Patients with positive SLNs that were initially reported as negative during intraoperative assessment were considered false negative (FN) events. Primary tumor histology, grade, receptor status, size, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), multifocality, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy, number of SLNs retrieved, and SLN metastasis size were evaluated. The study included 681 patients, of whom 262 (38%) received neoadjuvant therapy. There were 183 (27%) patients who had a positive SLN on final pathology, of whom 60 (33%) had FN events. On univariate analysis, lobular histology, favorable histology, absence of LVI and micrometastasis were associated with a higher FN rate. On multivariate analysis, favorable and lobular histology and micrometastasis were independent predictors of FN events whereas LVI and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy were not statistically significant predictors. The accuracy of intraoperative SLN evaluation for breast cancer is affected by primary tumor histology and size of the SLN metastasis. There was no significant association between neoadjuvant therapy and the FN rate by intraoperative assessment. This information may be helpful in counseling patients about their risk for a FN intraoperative SLN assessment and for planning for immediate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing mastectomy.
前哨淋巴结清扫术(SLND)是乳腺癌腋窝分期的标准技术,术中前哨淋巴结(SLN)评估对于决定是否进行额外治疗及重建至关重要。本研究旨在调查影响术中SLN评估准确性的临床病理因素。回顾了2004年至2007年接受SLND并进行术中冰冻切片病理评估的临床淋巴结阴性浸润性乳腺癌患者的记录。将术中SLN评估结果与最终病理结果进行比较。术中评估最初报告为阴性但最终病理显示SLN阳性的患者被视为假阴性(FN)事件。评估原发肿瘤组织学类型、分级、受体状态、大小、淋巴管侵犯(LVI)、多灶性、新辅助化疗或激素治疗、获取的SLN数量以及SLN转移灶大小。该研究纳入了681例患者,其中262例(38%)接受了新辅助治疗。最终病理显示有183例(27%)患者SLN阳性,其中60例(33%)发生FN事件。单因素分析显示,小叶组织学类型、良好的组织学类型、无LVI和微转移与较高的FN率相关。多因素分析显示,良好和小叶组织学类型以及微转移是FN事件的独立预测因素,而LVI和新辅助治疗的接受情况不是具有统计学意义的预测因素。乳腺癌术中SLN评估的准确性受原发肿瘤组织学类型和SLN转移灶大小的影响。新辅助治疗与术中评估的FN率之间无显著关联。这些信息可能有助于向患者咨询其术中SLN评估出现FN的风险,并为接受乳房切除术的患者规划即刻乳房重建。