• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前哨淋巴结切除术与乳腺癌临床淋巴结阴性患者常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术的比较:来自 NSABP B-32 随机 3 期试验的总生存结果。

Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.

机构信息

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927-33. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2
PMID:20863759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3041644/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) surgery was designed to minimise the side-effects of lymph-node surgery but still offer outcomes equivalent to axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND). The aims of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial B-32 were to establish whether SLN resection in patients with breast cancer achieves the same survival and regional control as ALND, but with fewer side-effects.

METHODS

NSABP B-32 was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at 80 centres in Canada and the USA between May 1, 1999, and Feb 29, 2004. Women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either SLN resection plus ALND (group 1) or to SLN resection alone with ALND only if the SLNs were positive (group 2). Random assignment was done at the NSABP Biostatistical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with a biased coin minimisation approach in an allocation ratio of 1:1. Stratification variables were age at entry (≤ 49 years, ≥ 50 years), clinical tumour size (≤ 2·0 cm, 2·1-4·0 cm, ≥ 4·1 cm), and surgical plan (lumpectomy, mastectomy). SLN resection was done with a blue dye and radioactive tracer. Outcome analyses were done in patients who were assessed as having pathologically negative sentinel nodes and for whom follow-up data were available. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. All deaths, irrespective of cause, were included. The mean time on study for the SLN-negative patients with follow-up information was 95·6 months (range 70·1-126·7). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00003830.

FINDINGS

5611 women were randomly assigned to the treatment groups, 3989 had pathologically negative SLN. 309 deaths were reported in the 3986 SLN-negative patients with follow-up information: 140 of 1975 patients in group 1 and 169 of 2011 in group 2. Log-rank comparison of overall survival in groups 1 and 2 yielded an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1·20 (95% CI 0·96-1·50; p=0·12). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival were 91·8% (95% CI 90·4-93·3) in group 1 and 90·3% (88·8-91·8) in group 2. Treatment comparisons for disease-free survival yielded an unadjusted HR of 1·05 (95% CI 0·90-1·22; p=0·54). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free survival were 82·4% (80·5-84·4) in group 1 and 81·5% (79·6-83·4) in group 2. There were eight regional-node recurrences as first events in group 1 and 14 in group 2 (p=0·22). Patients are continuing follow-up for longer-term assessment of survival and regional control. The most common adverse events were allergic reactions, mostly related to the administration of the blue dye.

INTERPRETATION

Overall survival, disease-free survival, and regional control were statistically equivalent between groups. When the SLN is negative, SLN surgery alone with no further ALND is an appropriate, safe, and effective therapy for breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes.

FUNDING

US Public Health Service, National Cancer Institute, and Department of Health and Human Services.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/f649cfe79f10/nihms-250175-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/b0e409eb37cc/nihms-250175-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/7a77f3e13781/nihms-250175-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/c439a866a099/nihms-250175-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/f649cfe79f10/nihms-250175-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/b0e409eb37cc/nihms-250175-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/7a77f3e13781/nihms-250175-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/c439a866a099/nihms-250175-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8453/3041644/f649cfe79f10/nihms-250175-f0004.jpg
摘要

背景

前哨淋巴结(SLN)手术旨在最大限度地减少淋巴结手术的副作用,但仍能提供与腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)相当的结果。国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)B-32 试验的目的是确定乳腺癌患者的 SLN 切除术是否与 ALND 一样具有相同的生存率和局部控制率,但副作用更少。

方法

NSABP B-32 是一项在加拿大和美国的 80 个中心进行的随机对照 3 期试验,于 1999 年 5 月 1 日至 2004 年 2 月 29 日进行。浸润性乳腺癌患者被随机分配到 SLN 切除术加 ALND(组 1)或 SLN 切除术加 ALND,仅当 SLN 阳性时(组 2)。随机分配由匹兹堡 NSABP 生物统计学中心(美国宾夕法尼亚州)进行,采用偏倚硬币最小化方法,分配比例为 1:1。分层变量为年龄(≤49 岁,≥50 岁)、临床肿瘤大小(≤2.0cm,2.1-4.0cm,≥4.1cm)和手术计划(乳房切除术,乳房切除术)。SLN 切除术采用蓝色染料和放射性示踪剂进行。对病理上评估为 SLN 阴性且有随访数据的患者进行结果分析。主要终点是总生存率。分析采用意向治疗。所有死亡,无论原因如何,均包括在内。有随访信息的 SLN 阴性患者的平均研究时间为 95.6 个月(70.1-126.7)。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00003830。

发现

5611 名女性被随机分配到治疗组,3989 名女性的 SLN 呈病理阴性。在有随访信息的 3986 名 SLN 阴性患者中报告了 309 例死亡:组 1 中有 1975 例中的 140 例,组 2 中有 2011 例中的 169 例。对组 1 和组 2 的总生存率进行对数秩比较,得出未调整的危险比(HR)为 1.20(95%CI 0.96-1.50;p=0.12)。组 1 的 8 年 Kaplan-Meier 总生存率估计值为 91.8%(95%CI 90.4-93.3),组 2 为 90.3%(88.8-91.8)。无病生存率的治疗比较得出未调整的 HR 为 1.05(95%CI 0.90-1.22;p=0.54)。组 1 的 8 年 Kaplan-Meier 无病生存率估计值为 82.4%(80.5-84.4),组 2 为 81.5%(79.6-83.4)。组 1 中有 8 例局部淋巴结复发作为首发事件,组 2 中有 14 例(p=0.22)。患者正在继续进行长期生存和局部控制评估。最常见的不良事件是过敏反应,主要与蓝色染料的给药有关。

解释

总生存率、无病生存率和局部控制率在两组之间统计学上等效。当 SLN 为阴性时,单独进行 SLN 切除术而不进一步进行 ALND 是一种合适、安全和有效的治疗方法,适用于临床淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者。

资金来源

美国公共卫生服务部、美国国家癌症研究所和美国卫生与公众服务部。

相似文献

1
Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.前哨淋巴结切除术与乳腺癌临床淋巴结阴性患者常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术的比较:来自 NSABP B-32 随机 3 期试验的总生存结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927-33. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2.
2
Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial.临床腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结切除与传统腋窝淋巴结清扫的技术结果:NSABP B - 32随机III期试验的结果
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Oct;8(10):881-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4.
3
Tailored axillary surgery with or without axillary lymph node dissection followed by radiotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer (TAXIS): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase-III trial.针对临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的量身定制腋窝手术(伴或不伴腋窝淋巴结清扫)联合放疗(TAXIS):一项多中心、随机III期试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Dec 4;19(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3021-9.
4
Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial.新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的前哨淋巴结手术:ACOSOG Z1071(Alliance)临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1455-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278932.
5
Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.腋窝清扫与保留腋窝在伴有前哨淋巴结转移的浸润性乳腺癌女性中的随机临床试验
JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.
6
Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.腋窝清扫与未清扫对乳腺癌伴前哨淋巴结微转移患者的影响(IBCSG 23-01):一项随机、对照、3 期临床试验的 10 年随访结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1385-1393. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30380-2. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial.腋窝淋巴结清扫术与非腋窝淋巴结清扫术对浸润性乳腺癌伴前哨淋巴结转移女性患者10年总生存率的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z0011(联盟)随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470.
8
Eight-year follow up result of the OTOASOR trial: The Optimal Treatment Of the Axilla - Surgery Or Radiotherapy after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: A randomized, single centre, phase III, non-inferiority trial.OTOASOR试验的八年随访结果:早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检阳性后腋窝的最佳治疗——手术或放疗:一项随机、单中心、III期、非劣效性试验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):672-679. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
9
Axillary treatment for operable primary breast cancer.可手术原发性乳腺癌的腋窝治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD004561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004561.pub3.
10
Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and technetium 99m sulfur colloid.使用乳晕下注射蓝色染料和锝99m硫胶体对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检进行一致性和验证研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Oct;195(4):467-75. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01312-1.

引用本文的文献

1
ASO Author Reflections: All Positive, Not All Necessary: Reconsidering Axillary Lymph Node Dissection When Every Sentinel Node is Positive.ASO作者反思:全为阳性,但并非都必要:当每个前哨淋巴结均为阳性时重新考虑腋窝淋巴结清扫术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18275-9.
2
Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Commonly Diagnosed Solid Organ Malignancies With High Mortality Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.淋巴结清扫术在常见高死亡率实体器官恶性肿瘤中的作用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88981. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88981. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes in sentinel node-negative adjuvant breast cancer patients receiving sentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project phase III protocol B-32.接受前哨淋巴结活检或腋窝清扫术的前哨淋巴结阴性辅助乳腺癌患者的患者报告结局:国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目 III 期协议 B-32。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):3929-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2491. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
2
Morbidity results from the NSABP B-32 trial comparing sentinel lymph node dissection versus axillary dissection.NSABP B - 32试验对比前哨淋巴结清扫术与腋窝清扫术的结果显示了发病率情况。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;102(2):111-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.21535.
3
The value of percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: comparison with pathological features.
经皮超声造影在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结检测与诊断中的价值:与病理特征比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):8309-8319. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2631. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
4
Feasibility of the omission of axillary surgery in node-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腋窝淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌省略腋窝手术的可行性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2025 Aug 22;83:104559. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104559.
5
Management of Isolated Axillary Recurrence in Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Targeted Axillary Dissection?乳腺癌孤立性腋窝复发的管理:靶向腋窝清扫有作用吗?
Cureus. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):e88753. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88753. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Management and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer with 1-of-1 and 2-of-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes.前哨淋巴结1/1阳性和2/2阳性的乳腺癌患者的管理与结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18097-9.
7
Biology is Queen: The Oncotype DX 21-Gene Recurrence Score Has Stronger Prognostic Ability than Lymph Node Burden for Patients with Breast Cancer.生物学才是关键:对于乳腺癌患者,Oncotype DX 21基因复发评分的预后能力比淋巴结负荷更强。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18086-y.
8
The outcome of selective delayed sentinel lymph node biopsy following upfront omission of axillary staging in low-risk invasive breast cancers: a retrospective hypothetical simulated analysis.低风险浸润性乳腺癌初始省略腋窝分期后选择性延迟前哨淋巴结活检的结果:一项回顾性假设模拟分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 12;16(1):1537. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03344-y.
9
The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Nodal Disease After Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.腋窝淋巴结清扫术在接受新辅助化疗后仍有残留淋巴结疾病的乳腺癌患者中的作用。
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2025 Aug 10;19:11782234251352996. doi: 10.1177/11782234251352996. eCollection 2025.
10
TIGIT, as a potential immune checkpoint target for immunotherapy of breast cancer.TIGIT作为乳腺癌免疫治疗的潜在免疫检查点靶点。
Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 5;42(9):407. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02955-3.
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed.
2000 年和 2006 年随机试验报告的质量:PubMed 索引文章的比较研究。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c723.
4
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检:一项随机对照研究的十年结果。
Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):595-600. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e92a.
5
Role of axillary clearance after a tumor-positive sentinel node in the administration of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer.前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌腋窝处理与辅助治疗的选择
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):731-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7554. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
6
Adverse reactions to patent blue V dye - The NEW START and ALMANAC experience.专利蓝 V 染料的不良反应——NEW START 和 ALMANAC 研究经验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;36(4):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
7
Surgeon training, protocol compliance, and technical outcomes from breast cancer sentinel lymph node randomized trial.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结随机试验中的外科医生培训、方案依从性及技术结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1356-62. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp281. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
8
Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons.乳腺癌手术的质量指标:可行性的初步验证及外科医生之间差异的评估
Arch Surg. 2009 May;144(5):455-62; discussion 462-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.56.
9
DNA damaging effects of the dyes used in sentinel node biopsy: possible implications for clinical practice.前哨淋巴结活检中使用的染料对DNA的损伤作用:对临床实践的潜在影响。
J Surg Res. 2009 Jun 15;154(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.07.039. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
10
Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? One-year outcomes of sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC): a randomized controlled surgical trial.基于前哨淋巴结的管理还是常规腋窝清扫?前哨淋巴结活检与腋窝清扫(SNAC)的一年结局:一项随机对照外科试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;16(2):266-75. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0229-z. Epub 2008 Dec 3.