Donohue Michael C, Sperling Reisa A, Petersen Ronald, Sun Chung-Kai, Weiner Michael W, Aisen Paul S
Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, San Diego.
Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
JAMA. 2017 Jun 13;317(22):2305-2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6669.
Among cognitively normal individuals, elevated brain amyloid (defined by cerebrospinal fluid assays or positron emission tomography regional summaries) can be related to risk for later Alzheimer-related cognitive decline.
To characterize and quantify the risk for Alzheimer-related cognitive decline among cognitively normal individuals with elevated brain amyloid.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Exploratory analyses were conducted with longitudinal cognitive and biomarker data from 445 cognitively normal individuals in the United States and Canada. Participants were observed from August 23, 2005, to June 7, 2016, for a median of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 2.0-4.2 years; maximum follow-up, 10.3 years) as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).
Individuals were classified at baseline as having normal (n = 243) or elevated (n = 202) brain amyloid using positron emission tomography amyloid imaging or a cerebrospinal fluid assay of amyloid β.
Outcomes included scores on the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC; a sum of 4 baseline standardized z scores, which decreases with worse performance), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 0 [worst] to 30 [best] points), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-Sum of Boxes; 0 [best] to 18 [worst] points), and Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0 [worst] to 25 [best] story units).
Among the 445 participants (243 with normal amyloid, 202 with elevated amyloid), mean (SD) age was 74.0 (5.9) years, mean education was 16.4 (2.7) years, and 52% were women. The mean score for PACC at baseline was 0.00 (2.60); for MMSE, 29.0 (1.2); for CDR-Sum of Boxes, 0.04 (0.14); and for Logical Memory Delayed Recall, 13.1 (3.3). Compared with the group with normal amyloid, those with elevated amyloid had worse mean scores at 4 years on the PACC (mean difference, 1.51 points [95% CI, 0.94-2.10]; P < .001), MMSE (mean difference, 0.56 points [95% CI, 0.32-0.80]; P < .001), and CDR-Sum of Boxes (mean difference, 0.23 points [95% CI, 0.08-0.38]; P = .002). For Logical Memory Delayed Recall, between-group score was not statistically significant at 4 years (mean difference, 0.73 story units [95% CI, -0.02 to 1.48]; P = .056).
Exploratory analyses of a cognitively normal cohort followed up for a median of 3.1 years suggest that elevation in baseline brain amyloid level, compared with normal brain amyloid level, was associated with higher likelihood of cognitive decline, although the findings are of uncertain clinical significance. Further research is needed to assess the clinical importance of these differences and measure longer-term associations.
在认知正常的个体中,脑淀粉样蛋白升高(通过脑脊液检测或正电子发射断层扫描区域汇总定义)可能与日后发生阿尔茨海默病相关认知衰退的风险有关。
描述并量化脑淀粉样蛋白升高的认知正常个体发生阿尔茨海默病相关认知衰退的风险。
设计、地点和参与者:对来自美国和加拿大的445名认知正常个体的纵向认知和生物标志物数据进行了探索性分析。作为阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)的一部分,从2005年8月23日至2016年6月7日对参与者进行观察,中位观察时间为3.1年(四分位间距为2.0 - 4.2年;最长随访时间为10.3年)。
在基线时,使用正电子发射断层扫描淀粉样蛋白成像或淀粉样β蛋白的脑脊液检测,将个体分类为脑淀粉样蛋白正常(n = 243)或升高(n = 202)。
结局包括临床前阿尔茨海默病认知综合评分(PACC;4个基线标准化z分数之和,分数越低表示表现越差)、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE;0分[最差]至30分[最佳])、临床痴呆评定量表总盒分(CDR - 总盒分;0分[最佳]至18分[最差])以及逻辑记忆延迟回忆(0分[最差]至25分[最佳]故事单元)。
在445名参与者中(243名淀粉样蛋白正常,202名淀粉样蛋白升高),平均(标准差)年龄为74.0(5.9)岁,平均受教育年限为16.4(2.7)年,52%为女性。基线时PACC的平均得分为0.00(2.60);MMSE为29.0(1.2);CDR - 总盒分为0.04(0.14);逻辑记忆延迟回忆为13.1(3.3)。与淀粉样蛋白正常组相比,淀粉样蛋白升高组在4年时PACC的平均得分更低(平均差值为1.51分[95%置信区间,0.94 - 2.10];P <.001),MMSE(平均差值为0.56分[95%置信区间,0.32 - 0.80];P <.001),以及CDR - 总盒分(平均差值为0.23分[95%置信区间,0.08 - 0.38];P =.002)。对于逻辑记忆延迟回忆,4年时组间得分无统计学显著性差异(平均差值为0.73故事单元[95%置信区间, - 0.02至1.48];P =.056)。
对一个中位随访时间为3.1年的认知正常队列进行的探索性分析表明,与正常脑淀粉样蛋白水平相比,基线脑淀粉样蛋白水平升高与认知衰退的可能性更高有关,尽管这些发现的临床意义尚不确定。需要进一步研究来评估这些差异的临床重要性并测量长期关联。