College of Kinesiology, 87 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017 Oct;42(10):1044-1053. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0093. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Both the repeated-bout effect and increased flexibility have been linked to reduced muscle damage, fatigue, and strength loss after intense eccentric exercise. Our purpose was to compare the eccentric-training (ECC) response after first priming the muscles with either static flexibility training or a single intense bout of eccentric exercise. Twenty-five participants were randomly assigned to flexibility training (n = 8; 3×/week; 30 min/day), a single bout of intense eccentric exercise (n = 9), or no intervention (control; n = 8) during a 4-week priming phase, prior to completing a subsequent 4-week period of eccentric training of the knee flexors. Testing was completed prior to the priming phase, before ECC, during acute ECC (0 h, 24 h, and 48 h after bouts 1 and 4), and after ECC. Measures included muscle thickness (MT; via ultrasound); isometric, concentric, and eccentric strength; muscle power (dynamometer); electromyography; range of motion; optimal angle of peak torque; and soreness (visual analog scale). Flexibility training and single-bout groups had 47% less soreness at 48 h after the first bout of ECC compared with control (p < 0.05). The flexibility training group had 10% less soreness at 48 h after the fourth ECC bout compared with both the single-bout and control groups (p < 0.05). Isometric strength loss was attenuated for the flexibility training group (-9%) after the fourth ECC bout compared with control (-19%; p < 0.05). All groups had similar increases in strength, MT, and power after ECC (p < 0.05). Prior flexibility training may be more effective than a single session of eccentric exercise in reducing adverse symptoms during the acute stages of eccentric training; however, these benefits did not translate into greater performance after training.
反复运动效应和增加的灵活性都与剧烈离心运动后肌肉损伤、疲劳和力量损失减少有关。我们的目的是比较在第一次用静态柔韧性训练或单次剧烈离心运动预刺激肌肉后,离心训练(ECC)的反应。25 名参与者被随机分配到柔韧性训练组(n = 8;每周 3 次;每天 30 分钟)、单次剧烈离心运动组(n = 9)或无干预对照组(n = 8),在 4 周的预刺激阶段,然后再进行 4 周的膝关节屈肌离心训练。在预刺激阶段、ECC 前、急性 ECC 时(第 1 次和第 4 次运动后 0 小时、24 小时和 48 小时)和 ECC 后进行测试。测量包括肌肉厚度(MT;通过超声);等长、向心和离心力量;肌肉力量(测力计);肌电图;运动范围;最佳峰值扭矩角度;和酸痛(视觉模拟量表)。与对照组相比,柔韧性训练组和单次运动组在第一次 ECC 后 48 小时酸痛程度降低了 47%(p < 0.05)。与单次运动组和对照组相比,柔韧性训练组在第四次 ECC 运动后 48 小时酸痛程度降低了 10%(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,在第四次 ECC 运动后,柔韧性训练组的等长力量损失减少了 10%(-9%)。所有组在 ECC 后力量、MT 和功率都有类似的增加(p < 0.05)。与单次离心运动相比,预先进行柔韧性训练可能在减少离心训练的急性阶段的不良反应方面更有效;然而,这些好处并没有转化为训练后的更好表现。