Gabison Sharon, Mathur Sunita, Nussbaum Ethne L, Popovic Milos R, Verrier Mary C
a SCI Mobility Lab, Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network , Toronto , Canada.
b Department of Physical Therapy , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Nov;40(6):723-732. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1328345. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
To determine if there is a relationship between trunk function and offloading of the ischial tuberosities in individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Prospective cross-sectional evaluation.
Sub-acute rehabilitation hospital.
Fifteen non-ambulatory participants with complete or incomplete traumatic and non-traumatic SCI, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), Classification A-D.
Isometric trunk strength using a hand held dynamometer, the ability to reach using the multidirectional reach test and offloading times of the ischial tuberosities using a customized pressure mat.
Participants who were able to engage in the multidirectional reach test were defined as "Reachers", whereas individuals who were unable to engage in the multidirectional reach test were defined as "Non-Reachers". Trunk strength was significantly higher in Reachers compared with Non-Reachers (P < 0.05). Offloading times over the left and right ischial tuberosities were lower in Non-Reachers when compared with Reachers, however the results were statistically significant only for offloading over the right ischial tuberosity (P < 0.05). There was no correlation between trunk strength and pressure offloading times for both groups.
Regardless of an individual's ability to engage in a reaching task, participants with spinal cord injury spent more time offloading the left ischial tuberosity compared with the right ischial tuberosity. The study highlights the need to identify factors that may contribute to offloading behavior in individuals with spinal cord injury who lack sufficient trunk strength.
确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的躯干功能与坐骨结节负荷减轻之间是否存在关联。
前瞻性横断面评估。
亚急性康复医院。
15名非行走型参与者,患有完全性或不完全性创伤性和非创伤性SCI,美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS),A - D级分类。
使用手持测力计测量等长躯干力量,使用多方向伸展测试评估伸展能力,使用定制压力垫测量坐骨结节的负荷减轻时间。
能够参与多方向伸展测试的参与者被定义为“伸展者”,而无法参与多方向伸展测试的个体被定义为“非伸展者”。与非伸展者相比,伸展者的躯干力量显著更高(P < 0.05)。与伸展者相比,非伸展者左右坐骨结节的负荷减轻时间更低,然而仅右侧坐骨结节的负荷减轻结果具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组的躯干力量与压力减轻时间之间均无相关性。
无论个体进行伸展任务的能力如何,脊髓损伤患者左侧坐骨结节的负荷减轻时间比右侧更长。该研究强调需要确定可能导致缺乏足够躯干力量的脊髓损伤患者出现负荷减轻行为的因素。