Department of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03473-7.
We have conducted a multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay in compared with conventional and molecular reference standard in four tuberculosis (TB)-specialized hospitals of China. A total of 5038 patients were enrolled in this study. The overall sensitivity of the assay for the diagnosis of TB was 92.7% [1723/1858, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 91.5-93.9]. In smear-positive/culture-positive cases the sensitivity was 97.7% (995/1018, 95% CI: 96.6-98.6), whereas in smear-negative/culture-positive cases it was 86.7% (728/840, 95% CI: 84.2-88.9). The agreement rate between MTBDRplus 2.0 and Xpert MTB/RIF was 97.7% (1015/1039, 95% CI: 96.6-98.5) for smear-positive cases and 97.0% (3682/3794, 95% CI: 96.5-97.6) for smear-negative cases. As compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, the MTBDRplus 2.0 correctly identified 298 of 315 patients (94.6%, 95% CI: 91.5-96.8) with rifampicin-resistance. As noted previously, isoniazid resistance is associated with many different mutations and consequently the sensitivity compared to phenotypic testing was lower (81.0%, 95% CI: 76.8-84.7). In conclusion, this assay is a rapid, accurate test in terms of increased sensitivity for detecting smear-negative TB patients, as well as an alternative for detecting both RIF and INH resistance in persons with presumptive TB, whereas the absence of a mutation in the specimens must be interpreted cautiously.
我们在中国四家结核病(TB)专科医院进行了一项多中心研究,比较了 MTBDRplus 2.0 检测与传统和分子参考标准在诊断中的准确性。共有 5038 名患者入组本研究。该检测对诊断结核病的总灵敏度为 92.7%[1723/1858,95%置信区间(95%CI):91.5-93.9]。在涂片阳性/培养阳性病例中,灵敏度为 97.7%(995/1018,95%CI:96.6-98.6),而在涂片阴性/培养阳性病例中为 86.7%(728/840,95%CI:84.2-88.9)。MTBDRplus 2.0 与 Xpert MTB/RIF 在涂片阳性病例中的一致性率为 97.7%(1015/1039,95%CI:96.6-98.5),在涂片阴性病例中为 97.0%(3682/3794,95%CI:96.5-97.6)。与表型药物敏感性试验相比,MTBDRplus 2.0 正确鉴定了 315 例利福平耐药患者中的 298 例(94.6%,95%CI:91.5-96.8)。如前所述,异烟肼耐药与许多不同的突变有关,因此与表型检测相比灵敏度较低(81.0%,95%CI:76.8-84.7)。总之,该检测在提高检测涂片阴性结核病患者的灵敏度方面是一种快速、准确的检测方法,也是检测疑似结核病患者中利福平耐药和异烟肼耐药的替代方法,而在标本中未发现突变时必须谨慎解释。