• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 MTBDRplus 2.0 检测中国疑似肺结核患者耐多药的应用。

Evaluation of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay for the detection of multidrug resistance among persons with presumptive pulmonary TB in China.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03473-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-03473-7
PMID:28611407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469733/
Abstract

We have conducted a multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay in compared with conventional and molecular reference standard in four tuberculosis (TB)-specialized hospitals of China. A total of 5038 patients were enrolled in this study. The overall sensitivity of the assay for the diagnosis of TB was 92.7% [1723/1858, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 91.5-93.9]. In smear-positive/culture-positive cases the sensitivity was 97.7% (995/1018, 95% CI: 96.6-98.6), whereas in smear-negative/culture-positive cases it was 86.7% (728/840, 95% CI: 84.2-88.9). The agreement rate between MTBDRplus 2.0 and Xpert MTB/RIF was 97.7% (1015/1039, 95% CI: 96.6-98.5) for smear-positive cases and 97.0% (3682/3794, 95% CI: 96.5-97.6) for smear-negative cases. As compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, the MTBDRplus 2.0 correctly identified 298 of 315 patients (94.6%, 95% CI: 91.5-96.8) with rifampicin-resistance. As noted previously, isoniazid resistance is associated with many different mutations and consequently the sensitivity compared to phenotypic testing was lower (81.0%, 95% CI: 76.8-84.7). In conclusion, this assay is a rapid, accurate test in terms of increased sensitivity for detecting smear-negative TB patients, as well as an alternative for detecting both RIF and INH resistance in persons with presumptive TB, whereas the absence of a mutation in the specimens must be interpreted cautiously.

摘要

我们在中国四家结核病(TB)专科医院进行了一项多中心研究,比较了 MTBDRplus 2.0 检测与传统和分子参考标准在诊断中的准确性。共有 5038 名患者入组本研究。该检测对诊断结核病的总灵敏度为 92.7%[1723/1858,95%置信区间(95%CI):91.5-93.9]。在涂片阳性/培养阳性病例中,灵敏度为 97.7%(995/1018,95%CI:96.6-98.6),而在涂片阴性/培养阳性病例中为 86.7%(728/840,95%CI:84.2-88.9)。MTBDRplus 2.0 与 Xpert MTB/RIF 在涂片阳性病例中的一致性率为 97.7%(1015/1039,95%CI:96.6-98.5),在涂片阴性病例中为 97.0%(3682/3794,95%CI:96.5-97.6)。与表型药物敏感性试验相比,MTBDRplus 2.0 正确鉴定了 315 例利福平耐药患者中的 298 例(94.6%,95%CI:91.5-96.8)。如前所述,异烟肼耐药与许多不同的突变有关,因此与表型检测相比灵敏度较低(81.0%,95%CI:76.8-84.7)。总之,该检测在提高检测涂片阴性结核病患者的灵敏度方面是一种快速、准确的检测方法,也是检测疑似结核病患者中利福平耐药和异烟肼耐药的替代方法,而在标本中未发现突变时必须谨慎解释。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay for the detection of multidrug resistance among persons with presumptive pulmonary TB in China.评估 MTBDRplus 2.0 检测中国疑似肺结核患者耐多药的应用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03473-7.
2
Diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of the Genotype MTBDRplus assay in diagnosing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Cameroon? a cross-sectional study.基因分型MTBDRplus检测法在喀麦隆诊断耐多药结核病中的诊断准确性及实用性?一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 31;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2489-3.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility of FluoroType MTBDR, a New Molecular Assay for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.氟喹诺酮耐药实时 MTBDRplus 检测试剂(一种新的耐多药结核分枝杆菌分子检测方法)的诊断准确性和实用性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00531-18. Print 2018 Sep.
4
Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples.评估基因型MTBDRplus VER 2.0线性探针检测法在痰涂片阳性和阴性样本中检测耐多药结核病的效果。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6.
5
Evaluation of the GenoType(®) MTBDRplus line probe assay on sputum-positive samples in routine settings in China.在中国常规环境下对痰涂片阳性样本进行GenoType(®) MTBDRplus线性探针检测的评估。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Sep;18(9):1034-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0857.
6
Diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous lymphadenitis on fine needle aspirates from Ethiopia.Xpert MTB/RIF检测法对埃塞俄比亚细针穿刺抽吸物中结核性淋巴结炎的诊断性能。
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014 Sep;94(5):502-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 28.
7
Diagnostic performance of genoType MTBDRplus line probe assay in bronchoalveolar lavage for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in sputum scarce and smear-negative patients.基因分型MTBDRplus线性探针检测法在支气管肺泡灌洗中对痰标本少及涂片阴性患者肺结核诊断的诊断效能
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):122-126. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_42_17.
8
A novel automatic molecular test for detection of multidrug resistance tuberculosis in sputum specimen: A case control study.一种用于检测痰标本中耐多药结核病的新型自动分子检测方法:一项病例对照研究。
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2017 Jul;105:9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime MTB and RealTime MTB INH/RIF Assays for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Resistance Markers in Respiratory and Extrapulmonary Specimens.评估雅培实时结核分枝杆菌及实时结核分枝杆菌异烟肼/利福平检测法在呼吸道和肺外标本中直接检测结核分枝杆菌复合群及耐药标志物的性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec;54(12):3022-3027. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01144-16. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
10
Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a high HIV prevalence setting.评估 Xpert MTB/RIF assay 在高 HIV 流行环境下用于诊断肺结核的效果。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul 1;184(1):132-40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201101-0056OC. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Current, Ongoing, and Future Approaches.结核病诊断:当前、正在进行及未来的方法
Diseases. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):202. doi: 10.3390/diseases12090202.
2
Increased Expression of IL-10 in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Correlates with Negative Interferon-γ Release Assay Results in Culture-Confirmed Tuberculosis Patients.外周血单个核细胞中白细胞介素-10表达增加与培养确诊肺结核患者γ-干扰素释放试验阴性结果相关。
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Aug 13;14:3135-3143. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S314084. eCollection 2021.
3
Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis.Xpert Ultra 与 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测疑似肺结核成人肺结核和利福平耐药性的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 22;2:CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub5.
4
Analysis of drug resistance and mutation profiles in isolates in a surveillance site in Beijing, China.中国北京一个监测点分离株的耐药性和突变谱分析。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520984932. doi: 10.1177/0300060520984932.
5
Rapid Diagnosis Of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Impacts Expenditures Prior To Appropriate Treatment: A Performance And Diagnostic Cost Analysis.耐多药结核病的快速诊断对适当治疗前的支出有影响:一项绩效与诊断成本分析。
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Nov 14;12:3549-3555. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S224518. eCollection 2019.
6
Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.用于成人肺结核和利福平耐药性检测的Xpert MTB/RIF及Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 7;6(6):CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub4.
7
Comparison of Quantamatrix Multiplexed Assay Platform and GenoType MTBDR Assay Using Smear-Positive Sputum Specimens From Patients With Multidrug- Resistant/Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Korea.使用韩国耐多药/广泛耐药结核病患者的痰涂片阳性标本对Quantamatrix多重检测平台和GenoType MTBDR检测进行比较
Front Microbiol. 2019 May 14;10:1075. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01075. eCollection 2019.
8
GeneXpert of stool versus gastric lavage fluid for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely ill adults.粪便 GeneXpert 与胃液检测对重症成年肺结核病的诊断价值比较。
Infection. 2019 Aug;47(4):611-616. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01295-5. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
9
Additional benefits of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis patients with prior exposure to fluoroquinolones.GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测法在检测既往接触过氟喹诺酮类药物的肺结核患者方面的额外益处。
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Dec 27;12:87-93. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S181259. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
A performance evaluation of MTBDRplus version 2 for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.用于诊断耐多药结核病的MTBDRplus v2版性能评估
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 May;20(5):631-7. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0788.
2
GenoType MTBDRplus Assay for Rapid Detection of Multidrug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis.用于快速检测结核分枝杆菌多重耐药性的GenoType MTBDRplus检测法:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0150321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150321. eCollection 2016.
3
MDR tuberculosis control: time to change the dogma?耐多药结核病控制:是时候改变教条了吗?
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Dec;3(12):907-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00477-4. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
Multicenter Evaluation of the Molecular Line Probe Assay for Multidrug Resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Detection in China.中国多中心分子线性探针检测法用于耐多药结核分枝杆菌检测的评估
Biomed Environ Sci. 2015 Jun;28(6):464-7. doi: 10.3967/bes2015.066.
5
Tuberculosis diagnostics in 2015: landscape, priorities, needs, and prospects.2015年结核病诊断:现状、重点、需求与前景
J Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;211 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu803.
6
Genotyping and molecular characteristics of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from China.中国耐多药结核分枝杆菌分离株的基因分型和分子特征。
J Infect. 2015 Apr;70(4):335-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
How is Xpert MTB/RIF being implemented in 22 high tuberculosis burden countries?在22个结核病高负担国家,Xpert MTB/RIF检测是如何实施的?
Eur Respir J. 2015 Feb;45(2):549-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00147714. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
Comparison of different drug susceptibility test methods to detect rifampin heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.比较不同药物敏感性试验方法检测结核分枝杆菌中利福平异质性耐药情况。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):5632-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02778-14. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
9
Tuberculosis prevalence in China, 1990-2010; a longitudinal analysis of national survey data.中国结核病流行状况,1990-2010 年;基于全国调查数据的纵向分析。
Lancet. 2014 Jun 14;383(9934):2057-2064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62639-2. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
10
Molecular laboratory testing for tuberculosis: innovators, early adopters, or laggards?结核病的分子实验室检测:创新者、早期采用者还是落后者?
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):977-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu024. Epub 2014 Jan 14.