• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类学习任务中特定巴甫洛夫到工具性转换所涉及的联想机制。

Associative mechanisms involved in specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in human learning tasks.

作者信息

Alarcón Daniel E, Bonardi Charlotte, Delamater Andrew R

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, USA.

2 School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jul;71(7):1607-1625. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1342671. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2017.1342671
PMID:28612645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6193757/
Abstract

Four experiments compared the effect of forward and backward conditioning procedures on the ability of conditioned stimuli (CS) to elevate instrumental responding in a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task. Two responses were each trained with one distinct outcome (R->O, R->O), either concurrently (Experiment 1) or separately (Experiments 2, 3 and 4). Then, in Experiments 1 and 2, four CSs were either followed or preceded by one outcome (A->O, B->O O->C, O->D). In Experiment 3, each CS was preceded and followed by an outcome: for one group of participants, both outcomes were identical (e.g., O->A->O, O->B->O), but for the other, they were different (e.g., O->A->O, O->B->O). In Experiment 4, two CSs were preceded and followed by identical outcomes, and two CSs by different outcomes. In the PIT tests, participants performed R and R in the presence and absence of the CSs. In Experiments 1 and 2, only the CSs followed by outcomes in Pavlovian training elevated responding. In Experiments 3 and 4, all the CSs elevated responding but based on the outcome that followed them in training. These results support the stimulus-outcome-response (S-O-R) mechanism of specific PIT, according to which CSs elevate responding via activation of its associated outcome representation.

摘要

四项实验比较了正向和反向条件作用程序对条件刺激(CS)在巴甫洛夫到工具性转移(PIT)任务中提高工具性反应能力的影响。两种反应分别用一种不同的结果进行训练(R->O,R->O),要么同时进行(实验1),要么分开进行(实验2、3和4)。然后,在实验1和2中,四个CS要么在一个结果之前出现,要么在其之后出现(A->O,B->O,O->C,O->D)。在实验3中,每个CS之前和之后都有一个结果:对于一组参与者,两个结果是相同的(例如,O->A->O,O->B->O),但对于另一组,它们是不同的(例如,O->A->O,O->B->O)。在实验4中,两个CS之前和之后有相同的结果,另外两个CS有不同的结果。在PIT测试中,参与者在有和没有CS的情况下执行R和R。在实验1和2中,只有在巴甫洛夫训练中之后有结果的CS提高了反应。在实验3和4中,所有的CS都提高了反应,但这是基于它们在训练中之后出现的结果。这些结果支持了特定PIT的刺激-结果-反应(S-O-R)机制,根据该机制,CS通过激活其相关的结果表征来提高反应。

相似文献

1
Associative mechanisms involved in specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in human learning tasks.人类学习任务中特定巴甫洛夫到工具性转换所涉及的联想机制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jul;71(7):1607-1625. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1342671. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
2
The effect of conditioned inhibition on the specific Pavlovian-instrumental transfer effect.条件性抑制对特定巴甫洛夫式工具性转移效应的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):82-94. doi: 10.1037/xan0000087. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
3
The effect of conditioned inhibitors and preexposed cues on the outcome-specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effect in humans.条件性抑制剂和预先呈现的线索对人类结果特异性巴甫洛夫到工具性转换效应的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):645-653. doi: 10.1177/1747021819887725. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
4
Goal-directed control in Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.经典条件反射-工具性条件反射转换中的目标导向控制
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):95-101. doi: 10.1037/xan0000191.
5
Single-response appetitive Pavlovian to instrumental transfer is suppressed by aversive counter-conditioning.单反应性食欲型巴甫洛夫式到工具性转换受到厌恶反条件作用的抑制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Dec;72(12):2820-2832. doi: 10.1177/1747021819862996. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Extinguishing cue-controlled reward choice: Effects of Pavlovian extinction on outcome-selective Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.消除线索控制的奖赏选择:巴甫洛夫式消退对结果选择性巴甫洛夫-工具性转移的影响
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(3):280-292. doi: 10.1037/xan0000176.
7
Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer: paradoxical effects of the Pavlovian relationship explained.巴甫洛夫式到工具性的转换:巴甫洛夫式关系的矛盾效应解析。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jan;39(1):14-23. doi: 10.1037/a0030594. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
8
Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control in a human learning task.人类学习任务中条件作用到工具性条件作用的转移。
Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1112-23. doi: 10.1037/a0022760.
9
Extinction of specific stimulus-outcome (S-O) associations in Pavlovian learning with an extended CS procedure.采用延长条件刺激(CS)程序的巴甫洛夫式学习中特定刺激-结果(S-O)关联的消退。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):243-261. doi: 10.1037/xan0000138. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
General Pavlovian-instrumental transfer tests reveal selective inhibition of the response type - whether Pavlovian or instrumental - performed during extinction.一般的条件性-工具性反应转移测试揭示了在消退期间进行的反应类型(无论是条件性的还是工具性的)的选择性抑制。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021 Sep;183:107483. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107483. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The learning of prospective and retrospective cognitive maps within neural circuits.在神经回路中学习前瞻性和回溯性认知图。
Neuron. 2021 Nov 17;109(22):3552-3575. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
Effects of hM4Di activation in CamKII basolateral amygdala neurons and CNO treatment on sensory-specific vs. general PIT: refining PIT circuits and considerations for using CNO.缰核内侧杏仁核神经元中 hM4Di 的激活作用和 CNO 处理对感觉特异性与一般 PIT 的影响:细化 PIT 回路和使用 CNO 的考虑因素。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 May;237(5):1249-1266. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05453-8. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Drug cue reactivity involves hierarchical instrumental learning: evidence from a biconditional Pavlovian to instrumental transfer task.药物线索反应涉及层次化工具性学习:来自双条件巴甫洛夫到工具性转移任务的证据。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jul;234(13):1977-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4605-x. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
2
Superior ambiguous occasion setting with visual than temporal feature stimuli.视觉特征刺激比时间特征刺激具有更高的模糊情境设定。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):72-87. doi: 10.1037/xan0000122.
3
Extinction and renewal of cue-elicited reward-seeking.
Individual differences in working memory capacity and cue-guided behavior in humans.
个体在工作记忆容量和线索引导行为上的差异。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43860-w.
4
Motivational sensitivity of outcome-response priming: Experimental research and theoretical models.结果反应启动的动机敏感性:实验研究与理论模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2069-2082. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1449-2.
5
Interpersonal dysfunction in borderline personality: a decision neuroscience perspective.边缘型人格障碍中的人际功能障碍:决策神经科学视角。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Jun;21:94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
线索引发的奖赏寻求行为的消退与恢复。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Dec;87:162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Appetitive Pavlovian-instrumental Transfer: A review.食欲性巴甫洛夫-工具性转移:综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:829-848. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Nucleus accumbens core and shell are differentially involved in general and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer with alcohol and sucrose rewards.伏隔核核心区和壳区分别以酒精和蔗糖为奖励,参与巴甫洛夫式工具性转移的一般形式和结果特异性形式。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 May;43(9):1229-36. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13235. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
The propositional basis of cue-controlled reward seeking.线索控制的奖赏寻求的命题基础。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2452-2470. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1115885. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
The effect of conditioned inhibition on the specific Pavlovian-instrumental transfer effect.条件性抑制对特定巴甫洛夫式工具性转移效应的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):82-94. doi: 10.1037/xan0000087. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
8
Extinction Can Reduce the Impact of Reward Cues on Reward-Seeking Behavior.消退可以减少奖励线索对寻求奖励行为的影响。
Behav Ther. 2015 Jul;46(4):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
9
Response-Outcome versus Outcome-Response Associations in Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer: Effects of Instrumental Training Context.巴甫洛夫式到工具性转换中的反应-结果与结果-反应关联:工具性训练情境的影响
Int J Comp Psychol. 2014 Sep 1;27(4):585-597.
10
Plain cigarette packs do not exert Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control over tobacco-seeking.普通烟盒不会对寻求烟草行为产生巴甫洛夫式到工具性的控制转移。
Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):174-82. doi: 10.1111/add.12756. Epub 2014 Nov 13.