Peres João, Mendes Karine Laura Cortellazzi, Wada Ronaldo Seichi, Sousa Maria da Luz Rosario de
Departamento de Odontologia Social, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Av. Limeira 901, Areião. 13414-903 Piracicaba SP Brasil.
Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Piracicaba SP Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Jun;22(6):1905-1911. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017226.00702016.
Oral health teams can work with both information of the people related to the family context as individual epidemiological through risk ratings, considering equity and service organization. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between tools that classify individual and family risk. The study group consisted of students from the age group of 5-6 years and 11-12 years who were classified regarding risk of caries and whether their parents had periodontal disease, in addition to the family risk. There was an association between the risk rating for decay in children (n = 128) and family risk classification with Coef C = 0.338 and p = 0.01, indicating that the higher the family's risk, the higher the risk of caries. Similarly, the association between the risk classification for periodontal disease in parents and family risk classification with Coef C = 0.5503 and p = 0.03 indicated that the higher the family risk, the higher the risk of periodontal disease. It can be concluded that the use of family risk rating tool is indicated as a possibility of ordering actions of the dental service, organizing their demand with greater equity, in this access door.
口腔健康团队可以通过风险评级,结合与家庭环境相关的个人信息,从个体流行病学角度开展工作,同时兼顾公平性和服务组织。我们研究的目的是评估对个体和家庭风险进行分类的工具之间的关联。研究组由5至6岁以及11至12岁的学生组成,除了家庭风险外,还根据龋齿风险以及其父母是否患有牙周疾病进行了分类。儿童(n = 128)的龋齿风险评级与家庭风险分类之间存在关联,系数C = 0.338,p = 0.01,这表明家庭风险越高,龋齿风险越高。同样,父母的牙周疾病风险分类与家庭风险分类之间的关联,系数C = 0.5503,p = 0.03,表明家庭风险越高,牙周疾病风险越高。可以得出结论,使用家庭风险评级工具可作为一种方式,用于安排牙科服务的行动,以更公平的方式组织需求,在这个接入点上。