Braun Doris I, Schütz Alexander C, Gegenfurtner Karl R
Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany; Allgemeine und Biologische Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Vision Res. 2017 Jul;136:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Visual sensitivity is dynamically modulated by eye movements. During saccadic eye movements, sensitivity is reduced selectively for low-spatial frequency luminance stimuli and largely unaffected for high-spatial frequency luminance and chromatic stimuli (Nature 371 (1994), 511-513). During smooth pursuit eye movements, sensitivity for low-spatial frequency luminance stimuli is moderately reduced while sensitivity for chromatic and high-spatial frequency luminance stimuli is even increased (Nature Neuroscience, 11 (2008), 1211-1216). Since these effects are at least partly of different polarity, we investigated the combined effects of saccades and smooth pursuit on visual sensitivity. For the time course of chromatic sensitivity, we found that detection rates increased slightly around pursuit onset. During saccades to static and moving targets, detection rates dropped briefly before the saccade and reached a minimum at saccade onset. This reduction of chromatic sensitivity was present whenever a saccade was executed and it was not modified by subsequent pursuit. We also measured contrast sensitivity for flashed high- and low-spatial frequency luminance and chromatic stimuli during saccades and pursuit. During saccades, the reduction of contrast sensitivity was strongest for low-spatial frequency luminance stimuli (about 90%). However, a significant reduction was also present for chromatic stimuli (about 58%). Chromatic sensitivity was increased during smooth pursuit (about 12%). These results suggest that the modulation of visual sensitivity during saccades and smooth pursuit is more complex than previously assumed.
视觉敏感度会受到眼球运动的动态调节。在快速眼动期间,低空间频率亮度刺激的敏感度会选择性降低,而高空间频率亮度和颜色刺激的敏感度基本不受影响(《自然》371卷(1994年),第511 - 513页)。在平稳跟踪眼动期间,低空间频率亮度刺激的敏感度会适度降低,而颜色和高空间频率亮度刺激的敏感度甚至会增加(《自然神经科学》,11卷(2008年),第1211 - 1216页)。由于这些效应至少部分具有不同的极性,我们研究了扫视和平稳跟踪对视觉敏感度的综合影响。对于颜色敏感度的时间进程,我们发现检测率在跟踪开始时略有增加。在扫视静止和移动目标期间,检测率在扫视前短暂下降,并在扫视开始时达到最小值。只要执行扫视,颜色敏感度就会降低,并且不会因随后的跟踪而改变。我们还测量了扫视和跟踪期间闪烁的高、低空间频率亮度和颜色刺激的对比敏感度。在扫视期间,低空间频率亮度刺激的对比敏感度降低最为明显(约90%)。然而,颜色刺激也有显著降低(约58%)。平稳跟踪期间颜色敏感度增加(约12%)。这些结果表明,扫视和平稳跟踪期间视觉敏感度的调节比之前设想的更为复杂。