Orthodontic Graduate Program, School of Dentistry University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, 11405 - 87th avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Head Face Med. 2017 Jun 14;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0144-2.
A reliable method to assess midpalatal suture maturation to drive clinical decision-making, towards non-surgical or surgical expansion, in adolescent and young adult patients is needed. The objectives were to systematically review and evaluate what is known regarding contemporary methodologies capable of assessing midpalatal suture maturation in humans.
A computerized database search was conducted using Medline, PubMed, Embase and Scopus to search the literature up until October 5, 2016. A supplemental hand search was completed of references from retrieved articles that met the final inclusion criteria.
Twenty-nine abstracts met the initial inclusion criteria. Following assessment of full articles, only five met the final inclusion criteria. The number of subjects involved and quality of studies varied, ranging from an in-vitro study using autopsy material to prospective studies with in vivo human patients. Three types of evaluations were identified: quantitative, semi-quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Four of the five studies utilized computed tomography (CT), while the remaining study utilized non-invasive ultrasonography (US). No methodology was validated against a histological-based reference standard.
Weak limited evidence exists to support the newest technologies and proposed methodologies to assess midpalatal suture maturation. Due to the lack of reference standard validation, it is advised that clinicians still use a multitude of diagnostic criteria to subjectively assess palatal suture maturation and drive clinical decision-making.
需要一种可靠的方法来评估中隔骨缝的成熟度,以便在青少年和年轻成人患者中做出非手术或手术扩张的临床决策。目的是系统地回顾和评估目前有哪些方法可以评估人类中隔骨缝的成熟度。
使用 Medline、PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 计算机数据库搜索文献,截至 2016 年 10 月 5 日。对符合最终纳入标准的检索文章的参考文献进行了补充手工搜索。
29 篇摘要符合最初的纳入标准。在评估全文后,只有 5 篇符合最终的纳入标准。涉及的受试者数量和研究质量各不相同,从使用尸体材料的体外研究到有体内人类患者的前瞻性研究。确定了三种评估类型:定量、半定量和定性评估。五项研究中的四项使用了计算机断层扫描(CT),而其余一项研究使用了非侵入性超声检查(US)。没有一种方法是针对基于组织学的参考标准进行验证的。
目前只有有限的证据支持评估中隔骨缝成熟度的最新技术和提出的方法。由于缺乏参考标准验证,建议临床医生仍然使用多种诊断标准来主观评估腭骨缝的成熟度并指导临床决策。