Department of Stomatology, Beijing Children's Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Stomatology, Beijing Children's Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Int Orthod. 2022 Jun;20(2):100634. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100634. Epub 2022 May 17.
The aim of this study was to perform an updated review of the in vivo methods to evaluate human midpalatal suture maturation and ossification, since this evaluation process remains an unsolved and critical problem in orthodontic treatment.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched up to November 30, 2021. Literature selection was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA, 2020 Edition) statement and was based on predetermined inclusion criteria. The overall and methodological characteristics of the selected studies were collected. The risk of bias was evaluated mainly through inter- and intra-evaluator agreement outcomes reported in each study. As there was a high heterogeneity among methodological studies, meta-analysis of the included studies was not applicable, and results were analysed descriptively.
Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Maxillary occlusal radiograph and computed tomography (CT), especially cone beam CT (CBCT), were reported. The occlusal radiograph is not adequate for evaluating the status of midpalatal suture maturation, and has been replaced by CBCT. Qualitative and quantitative CBCT evaluation methods provide limited evidence; however, opinions differ regarding the efficacy of these methods.
For midpalatal suture maturation and ossification status evaluation, evidence for the current methods is still limited. Further methodological studies should use image information comprehensively and provide verification evidence on larger samples.
本研究旨在对评估人类正中缝成熟和骨化的体内方法进行更新综述,因为在正畸治疗中,这种评估过程仍然是一个未解决的关键问题。
检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,截至 2021 年 11 月 30 日。文献选择按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA,2020 年版)声明进行,并基于预定的纳入标准。收集了所选研究的总体和方法学特征。主要通过每项研究报告的观察者间和观察者内一致性结果来评估偏倚风险。由于方法学研究之间存在高度异质性,因此不适用纳入研究的荟萃分析,结果进行描述性分析。
符合纳入标准的文章有 9 篇。报道了上颌牙合片和计算机断层扫描(CT),特别是锥形束 CT(CBCT)。牙合片不适合评估正中缝成熟状态,已被 CBCT 取代。定性和定量 CBCT 评估方法提供的证据有限;然而,对于这些方法的效果存在不同意见。
对于正中缝成熟和骨化状态的评估,目前方法的证据仍然有限。进一步的方法学研究应综合使用图像信息,并在更大的样本中提供验证证据。