• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

林堡语声调不存在感知重组?一项针对6至12个月大婴儿的跨语言研究。

No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants.

作者信息

Ramachers Stefanie, Brouwer Susanne, Fikkert Paula

机构信息

Radboud University,Nijmegen,the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2018 Mar;45(2):290-318. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000228. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1017/S0305000917000228
PMID:28615089
Abstract

Despite the fact that many of the world's languages use lexical tone, the majority of language acquisition studies has focused on non-tone languages. Research on tone languages has typically investigated well-known tone languages such as Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese. The current study looked at a Limburgian dialect of Dutch that uses lexical pitch differences, albeit in a rather restricted way. Using a visual habituation paradigm, 6- to 12-month-old Limburgian and Dutch infants were tested for their ability to discriminate Limburgian tones. The results showed that both Limburgian and Dutch infants discriminate the Limburgian tones throughout their first year of life. The role of linguistic experience, acoustic salience, and the degree of similarity to the native prosodic system are discussed.

摘要

尽管世界上许多语言都使用词汇声调,但大多数语言习得研究都集中在非声调语言上。对声调语言的研究通常考察一些广为人知的声调语言,如汉语普通话和粤语。当前的研究关注的是荷兰语的一种林堡方言,该方言使用词汇音高差异,尽管方式较为有限。采用视觉习惯化范式,对6至12个月大的林堡方言和荷兰语婴儿辨别林堡方言声调的能力进行了测试。结果表明,林堡方言和荷兰语婴儿在一岁以内都能辨别林堡方言的声调。文中还讨论了语言经验、声学显著性以及与母语韵律系统的相似程度所起的作用。

相似文献

1
No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants.林堡语声调不存在感知重组?一项针对6至12个月大婴儿的跨语言研究。
J Child Lang. 2018 Mar;45(2):290-318. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000228. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
The development of tone discrimination in infancy: Evidence from a cross-linguistic, multi-lab report.婴儿期语调辨别能力的发展:一项跨语言、多实验室研究报告。
Dev Sci. 2024 May;27(3):e13459. doi: 10.1111/desc.13459. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: a cross-linguistic comparison.粤语和普通话的声调感知:跨语言比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Sep;25(5):527-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01758181.
4
Statistical Speech Segmentation in Tone Languages: The Role of Lexical Tones.声调语言中的统计语音分割:声调的作用。
Lang Speech. 2018 Mar;61(1):84-96. doi: 10.1177/0023830917706529. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
On the Relationship Between General Auditory Sensitivity and Speech Perception: An Examination of Pitch and Lexical Tone Perception in 4- to 6-Year-Old Children.论一般听觉敏感度与言语感知的关系:对 4 至 6 岁儿童的音高和词汇声调感知的考察。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):487-498. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00104. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life.生命第一年词汇声调感知的发展过程。
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1367-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
7
Statistical learning of speech sounds is most robust during the period of perceptual attunement.在感知协调期,语音的统计学习最为稳健。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Dec;164:192-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
The separation between music and speech: evidence from the perception of Cantonese tones.音乐和言语的分离:来自对粤语声调感知的证据。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2711-20. doi: 10.1121/1.4747010.
9
Vowels, consonants, and lexical tones: Sensitivity to phonological variation in monolingual Mandarin and bilingual English-Mandarin toddlers.元音、辅音和声调:单语普通话幼儿及双语英普幼儿对语音变化的敏感度
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Testing the Hyperarticulation and Prosodic Hypotheses of Child-Directed Speech: Insights From the Perceptual and Acoustic Characteristics of Child-Directed Cantonese Tones.测试儿童导向语的超音段和韵律假设:来自儿童导向粤语声调的感知和声学特征的见解。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Aug 8;61(8):1907-1925. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0375.

引用本文的文献

1
How Tone, Intonation and Emotion Shape the Development of Infants' Fundamental Frequency Perception.语调、声调及情感如何塑造婴儿基频感知的发展
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 3;13:906848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906848. eCollection 2022.
2
Perceptual Reorganization of Lexical Tones: Effects of Age and Experimental Procedure.声调的知觉重组:年龄和实验程序的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 6;9:477. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00477. eCollection 2018.
3
One Way or Another: Evidence for Perceptual Asymmetry in Pre-attentive Learning of Non-native Contrasts.
无论如何:非母语语音对比前注意学习中感知不对称的证据
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00162. eCollection 2018.
4
Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Ability to Use Non-native Tone for Word Learning Deteriorates by the Second Year After Birth.单语和双语婴儿利用非母语声调进行词汇学习的能力在出生后第二年逐渐下降。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 15;9:117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00117. eCollection 2018.
5
Constraints on Tone Sensitivity in Novel Word Learning by Monolingual and Bilingual Infants: Tone Properties Are More Influential than Tone Familiarity.单语和双语婴儿在新单词学习中对声调敏感性的限制:声调属性比声调熟悉度更具影响力。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;8:2190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02190. eCollection 2017.
6
How Native Prosody Affects Pitch Processing during Word Learning in Limburgian and Dutch Toddlers and Adults.林堡语和荷兰语幼儿及成人在单词学习过程中母语韵律如何影响音高处理
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 22;8:1652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01652. eCollection 2017.